Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Disagree. The TG with the Backscatter 120-deg wide wet lens is pretty amazing. Yes, no manual control. Irritating, but not a deal-breaker. Dynamic range is an edge case; shooting into sun balls, for example.The TG is not really suitable for wide angle due otherwise the limited dynamic range and lack of manual control.
Manual strobe use with the TG iw easy and quite sufficient.For strobes you will want something that works with Olympus RC control such as the Backscatter MF-2 or the considerably stronger YS-D3 (for a TG or Oly camera).
Thanks for being honest!You asked for an honest opinion, I am not a TG fan. But the upside is that if you get a good set of strobes they can move to a better camera rig in the future. Why do I not like the TG? No manual control, tiny sensor and lack of dynamic range. The TG is good at macro where the tiny sensor provides a huge depth of field and the microscope mode is intriguing and lack of manual control is not as limiting..
I see a LOT of TG use by people on Reef trips, for example, as well as other trips. Once in all that time did I see a leak, and that was a string across the o-ring before closing. Dumb user error.It is not uncommon to see the diver dumping a little water out of them.
Exactly.I think you will be very happy with the TG in the OM TG housing, you can do a lot with it.
Needless expense. Just get the OM housing and the Backscatter Wide 120-deg lens.On more suggestion, if wide angle is your thing, the Ikelite TG houisng has a wide angle dome port accessory that allows the use of the OM system fisheye adapter. I am quite intrigued by it.