brtc, the "overall" shape of your two designs are triangles....whether or not you decide to look at it that way. Extend your two longest two arms out further and you have a triangle. That'll make all of your math easier. The cross beams (where your camera mounts as well as the extra support, AND where your hands go you can create another triangle). This would make 3 triangles, all sharing an angle which is where your camera would be looking. You can then make 3 triangles that are all stacked on top of eachother with all three of them being triangles with the same angles, sharing the smallest angle, and just differing in size. This is called "shared triangles with shared parts" in technical terms. Since it's symmetric, you can then draw a line to split your support in half long-ways. That way, you get a series of three right triangles. The math from there is really easy. However, the math proving that it wouldn't work is kind of difficult. I can upload a few drawing if you want me to expand on this, but suffice it to say that either the cross beam for your camera mount AND the support would have to telescope, OR the central support would have to telescope (or pivot) and the "main" (longest) beams would have to pivot. I know that doesn't make it easy for you to visualize, but just know that square is 1000x easier.