No thanks, but a Corona would be nice! It is getting easier to swallow, since my wife is having a ball with her digital.
I know I will eventually update to digital, but the 5 grand price tag is still a little stiff.
No thanks, but a Corona would be nice! It is getting easier to swallow, since my wife is having a ball with her digital.
I know I will eventually update to digital, but the 5 grand price tag is still a little stiff.
Yes you can see the difference. Probably not on a monitor screen, but in slides or 5x7 prints (or lager) done at a decent processor, yes. Would it make a difference to most UW photographers? Probably not. The point is, that the Nik V is a better camera. I can go on and on as to why. Is it worth the added expense? Thats up to the individual. If price is the issue than I have no problem recommending the MMII, it is a good camera. If the issue is ease of use, like it was in the original post, than I will take issue when someone recommends the MMII over the Nik V. A MMII is not any easier to use than a Nik V
I know I will eventually update to digital, but the 5 grand price tag is still a little stiff.
Dee once bubbled...
Would you like some water to wash that down with?
No thanks, but a Corona would be nice! It is getting easier to swallow, since my wife is having a ball with her digital.
I know I will eventually update to digital, but the 5 grand price tag is still a little stiff.
Do you think that the difference in optic quality in photos taken with Nik V's and MMII are visible to the naked eye?
To the regular diver who wants to take good photos while they are there, may only print as large as 8x10's for their wall, is that difference worth the extra expense of the Nik V?
I used a MMIIex for years and used a friends Nik V for a few months. I agree they are both easy to use, just a tad different. But I honestly couldn't tell the difference in the photos and couldn't tell which camera took which photos.
Yes you can see the difference. Probably not on a monitor screen, but in slides or 5x7 prints (or lager) done at a decent processor, yes. Would it make a difference to most UW photographers? Probably not. The point is, that the Nik V is a better camera. I can go on and on as to why. Is it worth the added expense? Thats up to the individual. If price is the issue than I have no problem recommending the MMII, it is a good camera. If the issue is ease of use, like it was in the original post, than I will take issue when someone recommends the MMII over the Nik V. A MMII is not any easier to use than a Nik V