more MFO

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

bvanant

Contributor
Messages
2,851
Reaction score
978
Location
Los Angeles (more or less)
Now with the OLY 60 macro lens. Focus speed is definitely crisper. I think that the photos are better with the MFO than without.
no MFO.jpg
with MFO.jpg
 
The resolution of the images is a little bit low to allow judgement, but the image made with MFO-1 is clearly sharper and crispier (maybe focus plane was better or is it the effect of MFO-1?)...

Wolfgang

P.S.: Few more photos of this kind and I fear I will go for MFO-1 (and replace the flip holder with SMC-1 against the bajonet system, keeping the SMC-1 in a pocket)...:)
 
So my take is that for the 30 and the 60 macro you get both a bit faster focusing and clearly better IQ. For the 45, you get faster focusing and maybe a subtle bit better IQ. Next week (we are between trips on the Wellenreng) we will see how it does with the 90. My take is that it really is worth the $ at least for the things that I shoot.
Bill
 

Back
Top Bottom