bluebanded goby
Contributor
I didn't get any responses from the M.D.s here when I tried posting a couple of weeks ago on this topic (though I suspect at least some of them were out of town). Before I throw in the towel, I thought I might give it one more shot:
Recently I had a spirometry test which shows that my vital capacity was 98% of predicted, but my forced mid-expiratory flow rate was 66%. The bottom of the normal range is 70%. The doctor said this indicated a possible issue with the small airways. Because I showed only slight improvement after being given a couple of shots of a bronchodilator and repeating the test, the doctor concluded that I don't have asthma. He did say I have "possible mild early pulmonary impairment" from having smoked for 15 years (but quit 15 years ago -- now age 49).
As far as I'm concerned I'm completely asymptomatic -- I don't get any shortness of breath during vigorous exercise or at any other time, and the doctor indicates my lungs sound completely clear. He didn't think there was any issue with diving, but he's not a diving specialist. I imagine there must be all kinds of ex-smoker divers out there who might test in a similar range.
I'm trying to decide if being 4% out of range on this test is worth spending ~$200 for a consultation with a DAN-affiliated hyperbaric physician to take a look at this. On the one hand I suppose the conservative approach would always err on the side of getting a consultation. But it's been my experience with many other medical tests that doctors frequently say, "Oh, don't worry about being a little out of range, we don't treat until you get to twice (or half) the normal value."
Any thoughts? If you were doing a clearance-to-dive and a patient came up with this score, would you clear him? Flunk him? Or would you want to run further tests? Thanks in advance for any reactions.
Recently I had a spirometry test which shows that my vital capacity was 98% of predicted, but my forced mid-expiratory flow rate was 66%. The bottom of the normal range is 70%. The doctor said this indicated a possible issue with the small airways. Because I showed only slight improvement after being given a couple of shots of a bronchodilator and repeating the test, the doctor concluded that I don't have asthma. He did say I have "possible mild early pulmonary impairment" from having smoked for 15 years (but quit 15 years ago -- now age 49).
As far as I'm concerned I'm completely asymptomatic -- I don't get any shortness of breath during vigorous exercise or at any other time, and the doctor indicates my lungs sound completely clear. He didn't think there was any issue with diving, but he's not a diving specialist. I imagine there must be all kinds of ex-smoker divers out there who might test in a similar range.
I'm trying to decide if being 4% out of range on this test is worth spending ~$200 for a consultation with a DAN-affiliated hyperbaric physician to take a look at this. On the one hand I suppose the conservative approach would always err on the side of getting a consultation. But it's been my experience with many other medical tests that doctors frequently say, "Oh, don't worry about being a little out of range, we don't treat until you get to twice (or half) the normal value."
Any thoughts? If you were doing a clearance-to-dive and a patient came up with this score, would you clear him? Flunk him? Or would you want to run further tests? Thanks in advance for any reactions.