Making fun of silly uw photo trends since 2011..

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

klausi

Contributor
Messages
468
Reaction score
450
Location
Dumaguete, Philippines
# of dives
2500 - 4999
There is no shortage of innovative equipment in underwater photography. One gadget which has become quite popular during the last decade is the “snoot” – a tubular piece of plastic which blocks the light from your strobe so that only the center of the field of view is illuminated.

The result are often very artistic, in a way that would probably have taken more than eight minutes to replicate in Photoshop. The ubiquitous snoot-ing has also influenced the styles in underwater photography in general: under-exposed images have become common, with dark-ish marine animals lurking in a corner of an even darker frame. Photographs which by all accounts are terribly under-exposed have become the fashion in underwater shooting.....

And now you can do even better with the Pacificklaus Technologies SuperSnoot™
... helping you to block every single light ray!
 
$795? shoot, I can get pictures like that all day long without that fancy piece of equipment. :rofl3:

Seriously, that was funny.
 
The price is $795. The author states at one point that: "The result are often very artistic, in a way that would probably have taken more than eight minutes to replicate in Photoshop."

So if I read this correctly, the author is, in effect stating that his time is worth roughly $100/minute. :rofl3:
 
The price is $795. The author states at one point that: "The result are often very artistic, in a way that would probably have taken more than eight minutes to replicate in Photoshop."

So if I read this correctly, the author is, in effect stating that his time is worth roughly $100/minute. :rofl3:

Well, that's only if you take a single picture. If you take a thousand (completely black) pictures, it's only $0.10/minute. And just think of all the different (completely black) images you can show your friends and post on Facebook.
 
Hanging in an gallery in paris is a picture frame with no picture. Just a white wall. Was considered cool at one time. Sort of the anti-snoot.
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/peregrine/

Back
Top Bottom