Good luck clipping this camera onto a D-ring and forgetting about it.
That probably should have it's own lift bag...
But seriously, how is that worse than a couple of stage bottles?
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Good luck clipping this camera onto a D-ring and forgetting about it.
I'm going to tell a story from a recent dive and I'd like to hear some various feedback. I'm pretty aware now of what I should have done differently, but I'd also like to know if you think the DM should have done anything differently?
I was certainly not suggesting that you did not check your gas, but I was surprised since it is so tight up on limits. I did not think a dive shop would even suggest or offer a 32% tank for that dive - mine certainly suggested only air. The shops I know on the island do not custom mix their gas and offer only a 32% or 36% mix from Meridiano. I should probably have said "32% Nitrox is not on the menu" but did not think to specify due to the prevalence of the standard 32% mix there (in my limited experience - perhaps 150 dives on the island). I do know that some shops do mix their own fills - but I have not used those shops. As I stated, Suunto uses a particularly conservative algorithm, although many consider it more realistic; I checked the MOD for 32% at 1.4 PP before I posted. I did not check it at 1.6pp but I know it is below 130'. I would not dive it at DT as it would exceed the limit on my computer even if I set it to 1.6 pp which I do not do (personal, conservative choice). I agree that 28% works and recently used a 26% mix for a 130' wreck penetration dive myself (not on Cozumel). My point is, I guess that while it may work depending on your tolerance for risk (OxTox does not set in instantly upon exceeding tolerances and individuals will certainly vary in their response to exposure) and the algorithm employed this does not leave much room for error. Those conditions (deep, dark, and in an overhead environment) are far from ideal for pushing tolerances to the limit.
You have a small camera. You are not going to have a Canon 5D Mark III in Aquatica housing with Sea&Sea YS-D1 strobes dangling from your harness. If you have an entanglement issue, you must unclip this camera and set it on the sea floor, because that setup is a magnet for line.
That probably should have it's own lift bag...
But seriously, how is that worse than a couple of stage bottles?
Hence why I seek a DSMB solution that I can deploy with one hand and a few fingers of the other.Much more delicate. What isn't shown in the picture, as it is on the back, is the viewfinder that protrudes. Given that the cost of this setup is over $10K and that it isn't a hammer, I'm pretty damn careful with it. Not sure if people are getting that. I'm not 100% happy with the way it is clipped on (something like this). So I'm not letting go of with one of my hands. And I don't want it banging around to cause it to flood at the viewfinder (a $1200 item).
View attachment 215464
That does sound like a very delicate viewfinder. Do you have a ring on your crotch? That's where I've always clipped mine. Hanging there when horizontal it is in zero g, below me.
As for making it easier to shoot a bag/smb, filling it with your reg exhaust is a good way to free up a hand.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk