Larium and diving?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Hi TimA,

You might find the following updated article from my "Ask RSD" column in a past issue of Rodale's Scuba Diving to be informative:

"Lariam (mefloquine) is a very effective drug in preventing and treating malaria, but can give rise to unwanted side effects, including vivid and disquieting dreams, hallucinations, anxiety, depression, confusion and forgetfulness.

The US package insert directs that "...caution should be exercised with regard to driving, piloting an airplane, and operating machinery as dizziness, a disturbed sense of balance, neurological or psychiatric reaction have been reported during and following the use of Lariam," and states that "dizziness, sensory & motor abnormalities, headache and fatigue have been recorded in patient's taking the drug." These cautions are consistent with suggestions by some in the medical and dive communities that mefloquine may produce side effects which mimic DCS.

Interestingly, the German package insert adds it should not be used for "certain activities which have a need for full attention and undisturbed motor activity," with a specific direction that pilots should not use Lariam for the prevention of malaria during their work.

Of most concern to the diver are the positions of some medical professionals that the drug simply should not be taken for malaria prophylaxis by those who are actively diving. These sources include Rodale's Diving Doc," Dr. Samuel Shelanski, and the German Society for Tropical Diseases. This later group, whose policies can be used as a basis for professional and legal action in cases of harm resulting from a physician's failure to follow them, states that people with a special need for three-dimensional orientation, for example pilots, scuba divers and others, should not take mefloquine as prophylaxis. Similar advice regarding scuba diving is provided by Dr Bridget Farham, B.Sc (hons), Ph.D, MB.ChB., an expert on tropical medicines, and appears in the package insert accompanying mefloquine dispensed in South Africa.

The above information suggests it would be prudent to take this drug only after detailed discussion with a physician who is fully aware of its current status, and to closely monitor for any adverse reaction.

The FDA has come out with the following warning regarding mefloquine:
FDA Creates Medication Guide for Lariam

and

This Journal of the American Medical Association (Vol. 297 No. 20, May 23/30, 2007), section on Lariam (mefloquine) JAMA -- This Week in JAMA, May 23/30, 2007, 297 (20): 2167: Controversies and Misconceptions in Malaria Chemoprophylaxis for Travelers
Lin H. Chen, MD; Mary E. Wilson, MD; Patricia Schlagenhauf, PhD
JAMA. 2007;297:2251-2263.


Helpful?

Regards,

DocVikingo

This is educational only and does not constitute or imply a doctor-patient relationship. It is not medical advice to you or any other individual, and should not be construed as such.
 
So in answering his question it looks like you're advising against it... right?

I took Larium for a few months before and never had any side effects (or maybe I'm dizzy and forgetful etc. all the time...).

My question would be, how frequent are side effects and if you're not experiencing any side effects what would be the chances that you would suddenly develop them while diving?

R..
 
Is there an alternative antimalarial for Sumatra region?

I inadvertently omitted this specific inquiry in my initial reply.

Yes, there is an excellent alternative that is best discussed with a tropical medicine expert. Malarone (atovaquone proguanil HCI) (MALARONE - Protect Yourself and Your Family From Malaria) is a newer drug that is quite effective and has a far more benign side effect profile, especially as regards the SCUBA diver. Which antimalarial is preferred depends on where the travel is, intercurrent diseases one may have, drug sensitivities and other factors.

Helpful?

Regards,

DocVikingo

This is educational only and does not constitute or imply a doctor-patient relationship. It is not medical advice to you or any other individual, and should not be construed as such.
 
So in answering his question it looks like you're advising against it... right? My question would be, how frequent are side effects and if you're not experiencing any side effects what would be the chances that you would suddenly develop them while diving?

Hi R,

If an effective alternative to mefloquine available, IMHO it should be considered, particularly when one is engaging in SCUBA.

Not everyone who takes mefloquine experiences the same side effects, and many users experience none worthy of mention.

If one has been taking mefloquine as prescribed (e.g., the drug is started prior to arrival at the malaria risk area) and has experienced no adverse reaction, then it seems highly unlikely that side effects would suddenly develop while diving.

Regards,

DocVikingo

This is educational only and does not constitute or imply a doctor-patient relationship. It is not medical advice to you or any other individual, and should not be construed as such.
 
I've seen the effects of Larium on surfers in Sumatra, but this is the 1st time a guest has asked to dive while taking it. I will advise against it and provide the alternative
Malarone. Much thanks for your recommendations and advice.











Surf and Dive Charters to North Sumatra, Simeulue, and Banyak Islands.
 
I wouldn't use Larium. Several of us were using it in India and after several weeks we were having effects like:
* seeing furry things (peripheral vision) that didn't exist in poorly lit rooms
* really bad nights of sleep
* feeling plain weird & out of it at times
The other folks using the alternative didn't seem to suffer the same weird effects that we were having.

So, I think taking daily dose vs. the once-a-week pill is worth it.

X
 
I wouldn't use Larium. Several of us were using it in India and after several weeks we were having effects like:

* seeing furry things (peripheral vision) that didn't exist in poorly lit rooms

Well in India that's not too surprising..... in poorly lit rooms there ARE furry things running around. There are more rats in India than people!~

[edit] Come to think of it, why were you taking a malaria prophylaxis in India? The chances of you getting Malaria in India are very very slim. [/edit]

R..
 
double post
 
What I've read about Lariam makes me think use something else. Even if the side effects are for a minority of people, they're more than I'd like to experience.

The Dark Side Of Lariam, How Dangerous Is It? - CBS News

"Dr. Paul Clarke, an infectious disease specialist and the medical director of a large network of travel clinics in Great Britain, organized his own study, after he and other British doctors saw problems with much greater frequency.

“It was confusion, it was disorientation, it was anxiety and panic attacks,” says Clarke. “There were episodes in which people were clearly divorced from reality and indeed had unusual symptoms that could be described as psychotic.”

Their research confirmed the hunch. Not one in 10,000, but closer to one in a 140 suffered disabling side effects, defined as substantially disrupting their lives - the same kinds of side effects that Dr. Clarke had seen in his patients.

Why such a huge difference in the numbers? Because of the key difference between the term “disabling” in Dr. Clarke’s study and the term “serious” as used by the drug company. In Roche’s study, serious meant you had to be dead, in the hospital or have a long-term disability to count. It’s an industry standard all drug companies use, but with that narrow definition, Dr. Clarke says, Roche’s study may have failed to identify up to seventy times more patients with troubling side effects."
 

Back
Top Bottom