Thanks for sharing! Kudos to the authors and all of those who contributed - a significant effort with some interesting and thought-provoking findings. Some initial thoughts:
- The conclusion of ROPE as the cause of the majority of snorkeling deaths was based partly on details from ten survey respondents/cases of non-fatal drowning that had pulmonary edema as a "(feature) commonly encountered". Were all ten diagnosed with pulmonary edema? How were those ten selected for inclusion in the paper from the 131 survey respondents?
- It was interesting to note that of the ten survey respondents mentioned above, seven of them had some sort of significant exertion involved, which is a precursor to SIPE, or ROPE as the authors call it, whether snorkeling or not.
- The authors noted that it was not possible to diagnose pulmonary edema in the victims of fatal drowning. It is reasonable to assume that the incidence of people susceptible to some sort of swimming-induced pulmonary edema has not changed, so what is behind the roughly seven-fold increase in snorkeling deaths from 1995 to 2019? Has there been that much of an influx of visitors who snorkel?
- There does not appear to be a mention of an association between the snorkels tested and the types of snorkels used by drowning victims or survey respondents.
- The overwhelming majority of snorkels tested had a negative inspiratory pressure of less than 8 cm H2O. The highest was 12.7 cm H2O, which is roughly the performance of a
US Divers Conshelf XIV at 70 fsw. Can someone speak to modern tolerances for inspiratory pressures for scuba regulators?
Interested to hear others' thoughts on this.
Best regards,
DDM