- Messages
- 5,721
- Reaction score
- 474
With loss of buoyancy control by far the leading cause of contact.
I don't agree that ...Hong Kong divers did not make many damaging contacts with corals...." I believe that "...38% were damaging contacts with corals or other biota in a single dive" is way, way too much.
Relatively small sample size, limited subject charcteristics, limited venue, only a single dive, etc., but for what it's worth:
"Understanding the underwater behaviour of scuba divers in Hong Kong.
Authors
Chung SS, et al. Show all Chung SS, Au A, Qiu JW.
Journal
Environ Manage. 2013 Apr;51(4):824-37. doi: 10.1007/s00267-013-0023-y. Epub 2013 Mar 8.
Affiliation
Department of Biology, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong. sschung@hkbu.edu.hk
Abstract
Diving-related activities may constitute a major threat to coral reefs. This study aimed to quantify the impact of diving in Hong Kong on hard corals and understand how socio-economic characteristics and experience level of divers influence diver-inflicted damage. We recorded and analysed the underwater behaviour of 81 recreational divers. On average, a diver was in contact with marine biota 14.7 times with about 40% of contacts involved corals and 38% were damaging contacts with corals or other biota in a single dive. The most harm-inflicting groups included inexperienced and camera-carrying divers. Although Hong Kong divers did not make many damaging contacts with corals, there is still an imminent need to determine the scale of damage from diving activities on the marine ecosystem given the rapid development of marine-based tourism and the limited coral-inhabited areas in Hong Kong where the marine environment is already under stress from anthropogenic activities."
Regards,
DocVikingo
I don't agree that ...Hong Kong divers did not make many damaging contacts with corals...." I believe that "...38% were damaging contacts with corals or other biota in a single dive" is way, way too much.
Relatively small sample size, limited subject charcteristics, limited venue, only a single dive, etc., but for what it's worth:
"Understanding the underwater behaviour of scuba divers in Hong Kong.
Authors
Chung SS, et al. Show all Chung SS, Au A, Qiu JW.
Journal
Environ Manage. 2013 Apr;51(4):824-37. doi: 10.1007/s00267-013-0023-y. Epub 2013 Mar 8.
Affiliation
Department of Biology, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong. sschung@hkbu.edu.hk
Abstract
Diving-related activities may constitute a major threat to coral reefs. This study aimed to quantify the impact of diving in Hong Kong on hard corals and understand how socio-economic characteristics and experience level of divers influence diver-inflicted damage. We recorded and analysed the underwater behaviour of 81 recreational divers. On average, a diver was in contact with marine biota 14.7 times with about 40% of contacts involved corals and 38% were damaging contacts with corals or other biota in a single dive. The most harm-inflicting groups included inexperienced and camera-carrying divers. Although Hong Kong divers did not make many damaging contacts with corals, there is still an imminent need to determine the scale of damage from diving activities on the marine ecosystem given the rapid development of marine-based tourism and the limited coral-inhabited areas in Hong Kong where the marine environment is already under stress from anthropogenic activities."
Regards,
DocVikingo