rmssetc
Contributor
@saridnour even on the LP side, you're talking ppO2 starting at 2.0 ish at the surface for air, and only goes up from there. The sensors we have are simply not capable of handling that. 2.0 at the surface, close to 3.0 at depth, just for air. Double that for EAN40. Simply not something the sensor technology can handle. Since the ppO2 is a function of IP, and no regulator is perfectly balanced to tank pressure, that sensor would also have to have a pressure sensor in it to normalize it.
Absolutely accurate, but perhaps you're overthinking it. Unlike a CCR, there's no need to measure the O2 percentage continuously during the dive. Imagine an AI computer that's got a small purge button -- either on the console (hose unit) or on the transmitter. Pressing the purge button -- while not submerged, please -- would divert air through a restricted orifice, then across an O2 sensor. The resulting O2 reading would be sent to the computer when the purge button is released. Bonus points for reading CO as well and popping up a "You Will Die" warning if it's over a set value (10PPM?)
The new computer+analyzer would be only slightly larger than a current console mounted computer (double the size of a transmitter, but the transmitter could be sold with an integrated short hose, using the same design for the hosed gas analyzer on a console).
PDC manufacturers could advertise this as the newest improvement in diver safety (particularly if there's CO measurement) and DMs would-wide would be stop having to tell customers how to set their own computer for Nitrox, and this would be great for gear rental packages.
Of course, this would also require a set of batteries separate from the computer or transmitter and a pressure resistant waterproof housing for the O2 & CO cells, but user accessible for [semi]-annual changes and a way to calibrate the cells without a stream of high-pressure air.
It'll never happen, at least not for less than the cost of a computer + 4 (5?) conventional nitrox analyzers.