Ok I'll assume there is no comparison between the 700 ikelites and the 150 intova, so the title is just to get viewers.
my real question is should I spend the big dollars on an ikelite? what are the features I am buying for the extra many hundred dollars? 10x more light? or is the difference more subtle like more increments in the power knob? (if they have one).
I am a beginner, I have taken about 500 underwater photos and about 1 hour of video. I have one sequence of a sea turtle on my wall, I got lucky one day. and it was sun lit. (10 ft).
my first camera was 150 total cost. I now have a G11 and ikelite housing as an intermediate step to playing with the big boys and about 1k invested.
so I am considering my first flash and my choices are go with a $150 intova until I learn enough to know that it is not enough, or buy an Ikelite and take a long time to learn enough to know how to use it.
how long does it take to out grow a $150 flash and will I be using a different camera by then?
my real question is should I spend the big dollars on an ikelite? what are the features I am buying for the extra many hundred dollars? 10x more light? or is the difference more subtle like more increments in the power knob? (if they have one).
I am a beginner, I have taken about 500 underwater photos and about 1 hour of video. I have one sequence of a sea turtle on my wall, I got lucky one day. and it was sun lit. (10 ft).
my first camera was 150 total cost. I now have a G11 and ikelite housing as an intermediate step to playing with the big boys and about 1k invested.
so I am considering my first flash and my choices are go with a $150 intova until I learn enough to know that it is not enough, or buy an Ikelite and take a long time to learn enough to know how to use it.
how long does it take to out grow a $150 flash and will I be using a different camera by then?