On to some thoughts on WA (wide angle) add on lenses for compact housings.
I advise people to consider three things.
FOV (Field of View, or angle of coverage), weight and cost.
Field of view is the most misunderstood.
Your camera lens "sees" through your housing's FLAT port like your diving mask. Light bending as it enters an air filled space makes things look closer and larger. A general figure is a 25% decrease.
An example is a camera's 24mm lens (for the popular Sony RX100 and Canon G7X models) will "see" like a 29mm lens's FOV. This is fine for subjects like head and shoulders shots of a diver, medium fish like groupers, fish schools and sponges, sea fans, etc.
On certain housing's you can add an air filled DOME
(commonly called an "Air Lens") that will RESTORE the full 24mm field of view UNDERWATER. These air filled space simply correct for the bending of light mentioned above. ABOVE water they do nothing and you can actually shoot through them in air. I do grabbing a surface shot in the boat or wherever.
Most housing's also have threads on the front commonly 67mm. These allow adding a GLASS wide angle lens widening the view both
above and underwater.
These glass lenses expand a lens to the equivalent of a 20mm, 18mm or wider "view". Many exhibit a bit of curvature like a fisheye style lens. Many UW photographers like this effect while others do not.
The GLASS wide angle lenses allow you to get close and fill the frame with large animals, big reef scene, shipwrecks, etc. In UW photography every foot closer will make a difference in the clarity and color in your photos or video.
The next issue is WEIGHT. I've posted many times an Air Lens weighs practically nothing (mine for my housing even floats) compared to any GLASS lens that will add weight to a compact system.
Finally, cost......Air lenses cost less than even the lowest GLASS add on lens. I'd ballpark Air Lenses around $200 while glass lenses from $400 - $800.00 with or without additional polycarbonate or GLASS domes making these lenses even wider and heavier.
For some the widest view is worth the extra cost and weight. Since I'm using a lightweight Fantasea housing
(full disclosure I'm a dealer but actual user) the Air Lens wins out. I've found any GLASS lens on my housing is just not my cup of tea to travel or dive with.
I also tend to shoot "tight" meaning I get close shooting at my UNDERWATER 24mm Filed of View. I've shot everything from Whale sharks to Mantas to shipwrecks and never really felt the cost and weight of a heavier more expensive lens were worth it.
I confess to being a do MORE with LESS person shooting with less gear
I hope sharing these insights will help folks make their own choice!
David Haas
Haas Photography Inc.
davidhaas4596@gmail.com
330-329-5981