Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
u.p.dvr:My instructor, a very experienced tek diver let us look over both sets of teaching material. IANTD IS defintely more detailed in the mathematical i.e. planning side of the sport. If your looking to advance down the road into trimix, I think the IANTD would be more useful into getting a start on the math required for the more advanced mixed gas planning. <snip>
I recently took the ANDI CSU course. I highly recommend this course. Search for my thread on ANDI CSU if you want to know more about what I learned in the classroom and the dives.andibk:You might want to check out a ANDI facility and see what they have to offer. The level 2 Complete Safeair course is a bit more then the PADI nitrox course. The information that you get from a ANDI manual seems to be quite a bit more then what you get in a PADI manual. They do not have a fancy film to show you but what you are paying for is the knowledge which makes up for that.
I second and third Bruces and Daryl's endorsment of ANDI CSU. I did my nitrox through IANTD, it was a good course but... I am a current PADI instructor as well as ANDI instructor. I refuse to teach PADI nitrox because the information is inadequate for truly understanding the concepts you need to know.Daryl Morse:I recently took the ANDI CSU course. I highly recommend this course. Search for my thread on ANDI CSU if you want to know more about what I learned in the classroom and the dives.
Doh...mossym:i think 3 years later they have probably made up their mind..quero found a thread from 2002..
LOL!mossym:i think 3 years later they have probably made up their mind..quero found a thread from 2002..
mossym:i think 3 years later they have probably made up their mind..quero found a thread from 2002..