If she were serious she would include wording that gave the biological father equal rights over the child in question. The child is half his.
If the father decides to terminate the pregnancy, shouldn't he have that choice? Creating a child should be a mutual decision between a man and a woman. Why then would the destruction of that child not also require a mutual decision.
There is a female vasectomy, it's called a tubal ligation. Perhaps this bone head should introduce a bill that all females upon reaching puberty should have a tubal ligation to prevent unwanted pregnancy. When the decision is make to intentionally have a child, the tubal ligation could be reversed. She's just crazy enough to do something stupid like that.
If the father decides to terminate the pregnancy, shouldn't he have that choice? Creating a child should be a mutual decision between a man and a woman. Why then would the destruction of that child not also require a mutual decision.
There is a female vasectomy, it's called a tubal ligation. Perhaps this bone head should introduce a bill that all females upon reaching puberty should have a tubal ligation to prevent unwanted pregnancy. When the decision is make to intentionally have a child, the tubal ligation could be reversed. She's just crazy enough to do something stupid like that.