Some use the term SAC or SCR to define a term that ends up in the units psig/min (which of course will change depending on the tank you use). RMV (respiratory minute volume) is used when the value is describing cu ft (or liters) per min.
Of course, some report SAC or SCR in cu ft/min, in which case it's the same thing as RMV. The terminology is confusing, but if you understand the principles, you're fine. We can all tell what you're talking about when the units are given.
As for the 33 ft vs. 34 ft for fresh vs. saltwater. Remember that your depth gauge is NOT reporting a linear depth from the surface. Instead, it's converting the sensed ambient pressure into a depth reading. Since the physiological effects of diving are only affected by pressure, the actual linear depth is irrelevant. So, you can use 33 ft for fresh & saltwater, as 1 atm = "33 ft" by definition.
Suppose you were diving in some high-density medium such that 1 atm of pressure was felt on your body at a distance 10 ft from the surface (if you dropped a line w/ foot-marks). Your computer would read a depth of 33 ft, even though you're only in 10 ft. of this hypothetical substance!
(At least that's my understanding....feel free to correct if I'm mistaken.)
Jim
Of course, some report SAC or SCR in cu ft/min, in which case it's the same thing as RMV. The terminology is confusing, but if you understand the principles, you're fine. We can all tell what you're talking about when the units are given.
As for the 33 ft vs. 34 ft for fresh vs. saltwater. Remember that your depth gauge is NOT reporting a linear depth from the surface. Instead, it's converting the sensed ambient pressure into a depth reading. Since the physiological effects of diving are only affected by pressure, the actual linear depth is irrelevant. So, you can use 33 ft for fresh & saltwater, as 1 atm = "33 ft" by definition.
Suppose you were diving in some high-density medium such that 1 atm of pressure was felt on your body at a distance 10 ft from the surface (if you dropped a line w/ foot-marks). Your computer would read a depth of 33 ft, even though you're only in 10 ft. of this hypothetical substance!
(At least that's my understanding....feel free to correct if I'm mistaken.)
Jim