vicky,
Thanks for the link. Very interesting reading, although since I wasn't planning on using the diopter with my lens, reading about its application sort of threw me off because it is not transpose what they said w/diopter to a non-diopter situaion.
They did mention that the image of infinity would be at 2x diameter, in which case for the Ikelite 6" dome would be 12". Focusing any closer would be up to my lens' capability. And with my lens' having a focusing range of 10" (its minimum film plane to subject distance) to ~21" (9" film plane to tip of dome, plus the 12" of virtual image I have to focus on.) It sounds like I cannot focus that close, having to rely on the depth of field of the wide angle lens for things to stay in focus.
I guess that is where the diopter would come in, somehow having infinity setting on the lens become the point where the virtual image is, and having the whole focus range of the lens to adjust based on my subject's distance.
So I presume the mfg that said that all I have to do is put the lens focus at 12" and everything from 12" to infinity would be in focus is not really a true statement.
I don't have a Ikelite dome, but I've seen reflections/reflactions on other domes and have noticed the floating holographic image that seem to be playing tricks on my eyes.
scorpiofish,
"3. If I decrease the f-stop to f16 or f22, would that increase the depth of field of the dome image down to 9in or 1.2ft (depending whether it is 1 or 1.5ft focus.)"
You are confusing DOF with minimum focus distance. Again, the DOF works under the same parameters of the lens above water.
I am trying to first set at minimum focus distance, then set f-stop to f22, this way, subject from 7" to 13" would be sharp. I might have interchanged some terms unintentionally, so when I say minimum focus when stepped down, it means subject still sharp.