How conservative is the Tusa IQ-700?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

scubamaverick

Registered
Messages
50
Reaction score
4
Location
Pompano Beach, FL
# of dives
500 - 999
I have a pair of Tusa IQ-700s that I have put 130+ dives on and have no idea how conservative the algorithm is on these computers.

I am considering moving to hoseless AI computers and wonder how they will compare on conservatism.


Are the IQ-700s considered conservative?
 
Its the same as the Nitek Duo and it is pretty much middle of the road in regards to conservatism.

In my opinon, hoseless air integration is a move in the wrong direction - lots more money, lots more to fail and no significant benefit what so ever.
 
It's more conservative than the Nitek Duo (I believe). I have the Tusa IQ-700 and while it's physically more or less the same the the Duo I believe the computer itself is more conservative.

Otherwise, I agree with the comments above. You're moving (in my opinion) in the wrong direction. You have a very good computer.

In any event there is no answer to your question since all AI computers aren't the same.
 
I don’t believe AI is a bad thing, however you must carry a brass & glass backup gauge with pressure & depth information. You also need to check both gauges while diving. I would not recommend using AI on deep technical dives.
 
Well ok... consider this. Way way back in the day when the Wisdom was brand new, I started diving with a Sherwood Wisdom, in part to spend down the shop credit for reg repair, and in part because it was not really much larger than an SPG, was very tolerant of deco (used US navy limits once in deco) and deep stops. That made it, at a minimum, a decent depth gauge and bottom timer to back up to custom cut tables for deep air and nitrox diving.

What I found however was that i never used the air time remaining information as 1) it never displayed it as on deep dives deco time remaining was always less and once in deco it gave you deco time, 2) I already new my SAC and was estimating air time remaining already, and 3) in deep diving you do a gas plan and already know if you have enough gas for the bottom time and reserve.

In short - no plusses to using one at all.

There were however a lot of minuses. 1) The battery indicator would say everything was peachy on a 100 degree boat deck then the computer would shut down at 100-150' with 39-35 degree bottom temps. 2) The air integration was prone to failure a) from battery failure, b) transducer failure (I experienced both high and low failures on 2 separate wisdoms) and quick disconnect failures (in this case an Uwatec QD on the HP end of the hose - not the Sherwood QD at the cmputer end of the hose, my last wisdom computer had that - worked great but never trusted it).

So in the end you gain basically nothing, but acquire lots of new and interesting modes of failure that when they occur impact both SPG information and depth/time information.

In comparison a brass and glass SPG is near bullet proof and will work fine even when flooded, and an inexpensive bottom timer and a set of tables or contingency deco schedule will easily back up a wrist computer failure.
 

Back
Top Bottom