Hi all,
My husband and I bought a Canon Digital Rebel last December, and we've been planning to get a housing for it once we have the money. (Since it's not just housing, but dome ports, strobes, etc).
Jeff (that's the husband) just brought up an interesting point: would it be cheaper and easier to go the Olympus 50xx route? The camera and housing together would cost about the same as the Ike Rebel housing, and there'd be no dome ports to worry about.... the more we thought about it, the more appealing it was.
Of course, I LOVE the digital rebel - on land. And I figured we'd want all that same functionality underwater. But ever since he brought it up, I'm not so sure - maybe a high-resolution point-and-shoot is the better way to go. It's tricky to do too much fiddling around with settings underwater anyway.
Discovering that Dee and Gilligan both use Oly's really pushed me over the edge, and now I'm super-seriously considering this new plan of action. (Which would have the extra benefit of keeping my precious digital rebel totally free of the risk of flood damage).
So, I was wondering if I could get a few Olympus users to chime in, as well as those of you who've decided that SLR is the way to go. Anyone use an SLR on land, but decided to stick with a point/shoot underwater? Do you wish you had access to different lenses and more control over your camera?
Opinions, please! Thanks.
My husband and I bought a Canon Digital Rebel last December, and we've been planning to get a housing for it once we have the money. (Since it's not just housing, but dome ports, strobes, etc).
Jeff (that's the husband) just brought up an interesting point: would it be cheaper and easier to go the Olympus 50xx route? The camera and housing together would cost about the same as the Ike Rebel housing, and there'd be no dome ports to worry about.... the more we thought about it, the more appealing it was.
Of course, I LOVE the digital rebel - on land. And I figured we'd want all that same functionality underwater. But ever since he brought it up, I'm not so sure - maybe a high-resolution point-and-shoot is the better way to go. It's tricky to do too much fiddling around with settings underwater anyway.
Discovering that Dee and Gilligan both use Oly's really pushed me over the edge, and now I'm super-seriously considering this new plan of action. (Which would have the extra benefit of keeping my precious digital rebel totally free of the risk of flood damage).
So, I was wondering if I could get a few Olympus users to chime in, as well as those of you who've decided that SLR is the way to go. Anyone use an SLR on land, but decided to stick with a point/shoot underwater? Do you wish you had access to different lenses and more control over your camera?
Opinions, please! Thanks.