MikeFerrara once bubbled...
PopeyeHow does cold water in an ear make you think you are out of air? I'm starting to think you are just from a different plannet.
You need to read up on the cause and effect of spatial disorientation. Regardless, whether or not he was narced, no training you endorse would have prepared him to handle that particular part of his episode. As I already said, once his mistake was made, for whatever reason, he obviously handled the situation quite well, despite his disorientation.
MikeFerrara once bubbled...
PopeyeSomehow you don't seem to think it's a problem when a diver thinks he is out of air when he isn't. Only one out of five had a problem with a free flow? Not bad huh?
From a global perspective, or what? You tell me, from the information presented, exactly what was the problem?
And about the other dozen questions that you seem to have missed (again):
Again: "First, that was a slippery side step, but my point was:
"This does show one really cool thing though:
If the original poster had a $1000 dollar trimix ticket, and a END of 100, let alone 130,
HE STILL WOULD HAVE BEEN NARCED.
Once again showing the foolishness of an arbitrary limit.
Maybe, just maybe, a little experience with narcosis would have given him the necessary tools to handle the situation, or recognise it earlier."
Any comment on that? Narced at 84'?
"Why should one explore their air depth boundries? Of what use is that information and at what risk? All it takes is a little He and it's a nonissue." - Mike Ferrara
Second, per your remarks above, I'm beginning to see what the problem is.
First, you feel he was unprepared for the dive. On what basis?
You state: "My opinion is that regarless of whether the problem was narcosis, overexertion from poor buoyancy control or if he was just uncomfortable he doesn't seem to have been prepared for the dive. "
While you did leave out CO2, you seem to have come up with severeral groundless assumptions about difficulties he was having.
Where do you get this stuff from?
This guy states he was narced at 84 ft (he probably had cold water in one ear, but that's a different topic).
That's all he says. You come up with poor buoyancy control, overexertion, lack of comfort.
And on that subject, did he not take the right action in light of his incorrect assumption?
Buddy signal, air sharing, controled tandem ascent, safety stop?
What is your complaint here?
Then you go on about the five "incidents" that he witnessed, and what does that mean?
Mike, what is a "freeflow"? We must have different meanings. He said he witnessed five free flows. No mention was made of any diving dificulties, depths, injuries, except maybe the "cold air guy", if that was one of the five. Were the freeflows during diving? At the beginning of a dive? While standing in waist deep water?
Yet once again, you make a training issue out of it.
The water was 41 degrees. Of course you're bound to see some freeflows.
Mike, from what you've read, what level of certification do you feel this diver has?"