eelnoraa
Contributor
For HP120, first take look at it in person. It is a very long tank. Your height will play a role in selecting optimal IMO.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Everyone has to start somewhere. And, there are plenty of dive buddy teams in which equally inexperienced divers are matched. And, notwithstanding the grumbling some of us do about limitations in open water training, etc., etc., those buddy teams are, in general, surviving and thriving. That doesn't mean you will not benefit greatly from diving with more experienced divers, to continue your learning - you will. But, your success in linking up with other divers as a buddy will be influenced primarily by your attitude, not your gear.but unlike flying where I wasn't allowed to carry passengers during training solos, diving culture says I am obliged to expose a "buddy" to whatever hazards my ignorance might create. It's a really awkward and morally ambiguous situation. . . . FWIW I'm probably not really a menace to all around me, but the less you know, the more you think you know.
An interesting, and thoughtful, question. My immediate response is, 'No, it will not.' But, here are the caveats: First, I don't consider a BP and wing to be at all 'unconventional' for recreational, single tank diving. Yes, you see new divers much less commonly geared in BP/W rigs than in jacket or even soft, back-inflate BCDs. But, that doesn't make them 'unconventional'. Similarly, I don't consider a long hose primary second stage with a bungeed, necklace back-up second stage to be at all 'unconventional'. Yes, they are less commonly seen that regulators with shorter hoses, but that does not make them 'unconventional'. Second, if you show up to dive at a site and sense a negative reaction to your rig from a prospective buddy, look for another buddy. If you show up for a class in a BP/W and a long hose / bungeed necklace regulator set-up, and the instructor gives you a hard time about it, find another instructor - seriously. In fairness to prospective instructors, if you sign up for a class, let them know what your rig is. I have had only a handful of AOW students show up in a BP/W, for example. But, I welcome that situation when it occurs. I even try to point out the differences in rigs among students in each class, as a positive learning opportunity. If a student has a rig that they have not yet 'squared away' - they have lots of danglies, and Christmas ornaments clipped to an abundant supply of D-rings, I will offer suggestions and help to correct that situation. I do want to be sure that they are familiar with the rig - they do not have to be proficient - for their own safety. But, I always ask AOW students, in advance of the diving weekend, to tell me what kind of gear they are diivng so I know what to expect.The point is, I need to learn. I need to do that locally vs booking a trip somewhere where where I could mess with someone's vacation. That means exposing myself to the opinions and biases of instructors...so I show up with a totally unconventional BC, and unconventional hoses, and I am not going to be well practiced with my new gear (noob, remember), and I just wonder what the reaction will be. Which is my ignorant question: Is going off the beaten path with equipment going to restrict my diving education and buddy choices?
I personally have no problem going with no weight added to my tank and BP.I was using an aluminum 80 yesterday and w/ empty tank and 6lbs of lead I sank easily. I didn't try less, but that's without any suit. I suspect a steel would take me to sinking with 0 lead (still sans suit). Is that acceptable?
There is nothing at all wrong with an AL80 - it is probably the single most common scuba cylinder in use in the Western Hemisphere. AL80s are substantially less expensive than steels. Whether steels are 'worth it' or not depends on what you want them to provide - more air, better / different bouyancy and trim, a way to take lead off your waist, etc. Although some people on SB report problems at some fill stations getting a full HP fill (to 3442 psi), I have never had that problem in the eastern US. I am not saying it might not be a problem, only that I have never encountered it.Cost wise, aluminum 80s are about $180 with a din/yoke valve. The HP120 looks like $400 with the same sort of valve. Worth the difference? Also, do shops charge different amounts to fill different size tanks? Do they all fill HP to capacity?
Tank... Looks like a HP120 comes in at -11 to -2 (full to empty) buoyancy. A 80cf aluminum ranges from -1.8 to +2.6 lbs from what I can find.
I was using an aluminum 80 yesterday and w/ empty tank and 6lbs of lead I sank easily. I didn't try less, but that's without any suit. I suspect a steel would take me to sinking with 0 lead (still sans suit). Is that acceptable?
Cost wise, aluminum 80s are about $180 with a din/yoke valve. The HP120 looks like $400 with the same sort of valve. Worth the difference? Also, do shops charge different amounts to fill different size tanks? Do they all fill HP to capacity? The only place I've had a tank filled was "fills $8" but I don't know how any of that really works with different tanks.
If you become a PADI dive master, you will be wearing the jacket sold at your LDS, Black hose primary second, yellow hose backup second. Why? because that's what the students wear and you don't want to confuse them. If you will just dive for your own entertainment, then this is a vote for backplate and long hose. The DIR rig is a bit more comfortable and the minimalistic style will cost more for quality gear, but cost less overall (the DIR method will cause you to bring only what you need-> fewer toys, more focus on diving!)
DIN- Why? Because if you go yoke, you can only use LP tanks. Someday, you may want to use DIN and LP tanks.
Local conditions vary from warm (surface water temps were 89f last weekend) to cold but well short of ice. This is north Texas. If there is a kind of weather, we'll see it eventually.