I work in healthcare. That is less than ideal, but it would work. The risk for transmission would be higher than with a closed loop used in standard intubation though. There is also a higher risk for leaks, loss of positive pressure, but necessity is the mother of invention and who knows, given"s the shortage, this may save lives.
Being intubated exposes a patient to avoidable risks if non-invasive ventilation could work for him. As Angelo conceded, this would not be a solution for the sickest patients, but it might help to increase overall survival. It could also be used with more basic, and plentiful, ventilators (Bipap machines) at a time when hospitals would need to make the best use of all their equipment.
I think you also have to consider the ethics of intubating a patient for infection control purposes (efficient filtering of exhaled gases) rather than for what would give him his
best chance for survival.I work in healthcare. That is less than ideal, but it would work. The risk for transmission would be higher than with a closed loop used in standard intubation though. There is also a higher risk for leaks, loss of positive pressure, but necessity is the mother of invention and who knows, given the shortage, this may save lives.