Fujifilm XP160 to Olympus TG-6?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Marlene996

Registered
Messages
30
Reaction score
35
Location
Hawaii
# of dives
0 - 24
I currently have a Costco Fujifilm XP-160 water camera which has been great for surf photography but now I take it diving and I'm finding it lacking. I can get descent pictures of fish but I really want to take nice macro shots of smaller fish and animals in the reef and I don't really want to break the bank at this moment. I just started diving and have a long list of gear to buy (wetsuit, computer, and mask are checked off haha).

Will the Olympus TG-6 really be an upgrade or am I just trading same for same? On paper the specs seem about the same, but I've read some threads where divers really love them. Any advice or recommendations would be appreciated.

These pictures of the nudi and crab are without flash and the last with.
 

Attachments

  • 429AD333-60A6-452C-A3A1-1222B64DB7A0.jpeg
    429AD333-60A6-452C-A3A1-1222B64DB7A0.jpeg
    134.2 KB · Views: 67
  • 3B8AD6FE-8E3B-489B-B253-7D5895F1F4E6.jpeg
    3B8AD6FE-8E3B-489B-B253-7D5895F1F4E6.jpeg
    151.3 KB · Views: 61
  • EB458B85-CFC6-4020-A0D6-12B88F70D83D.jpeg
    EB458B85-CFC6-4020-A0D6-12B88F70D83D.jpeg
    153.4 KB · Views: 63
Either way you go, I’ll note that the onboard flash for pretty much any camera won’t cut it underwater. Just not powerful enough.

That said, among the advantages of the TG-6, is the wide range of available accessories for it, including a dedicated underwater housing, which I highly recommend.Even though the camera itself is waterproof, it will help with the wear and tear of saltwater diving, and expand the depth rating of the setup substantially. It can also be rigged up to use it’s onboard flash to trigger a larger external strobe, which will help underwater photos immensely. Lots of video light mounting options as well.

It’s also a really sharp macro shooter. Really punches above weight there.

Backscatter has a good overview of the TG-6 and assorted ways to accessorize it to your needs:
 
I'd say yes, TG-6 is great for close-ups and macro. I haven't used TG-6 much yet since I just got it last Summer to replace TG-4, but the optics are pretty much the same.
 

Attachments

  • 52549276337_cd856b13f6_o.jpg
    52549276337_cd856b13f6_o.jpg
    62.7 KB · Views: 59
  • 52550278538_33c3e20d5f_o.jpg
    52550278538_33c3e20d5f_o.jpg
    62.3 KB · Views: 69
Looking at your photos I would say swapping your camera by itself won't make any difference to your photos.

What will make a considerable improvement is 1) getting an external strobe to light up your subject and 2) getting close to your subject and zooming in to fill the photo.

The TG-6 has great macro ability, but that's no use if you can't light the subject. The XP-150 has a 5X zoom that should be ok to learn macro.

I'm not sure what external strobes and trays/arms are compatible with the XP-150. If there is a suitable small strobe I would spend my money on it, rather than a new camera, and push the XP-150 until you fill limited by its focusing characteristics.

As AggressorBlue mentions the good thing about the TG-6 is that there's plenty of accessories (including strobes) and excellent documentation on doing macro with it.

Cheers
Rohan.
 
I'd say yes, TG-6 is great for close-ups and macro. I haven't used TG-6 much yet since I just got it last Summer to replace TG-4, but the optics are pretty much the same.
Nice shots, but do you always pick stuff up to photograph it?
 
Looking at your photos I would say swapping your camera by itself won't make any difference to your photos.

What will make a considerable improvement is 1) getting an external strobe to light up your subject and 2) getting close to your subject and zooming in to fill the photo.

The TG-6 has great macro ability, but that's no use if you can't light the subject. The XP-150 has a 5X zoom that should be ok to learn macro.

I'm not sure what external strobes and trays/arms are compatible with the XP-150. If there is a suitable small strobe I would spend my money on it, rather than a new camera, and push the XP-150 until you fill limited by its focusing characteristics.

As AggressorBlue mentions the good thing about the TG-6 is that there's plenty of accessories (including strobes) and excellent documentation on doing macro with it.

Cheers
Rohan.
I agree. You can't shoot small stuff from very far away.....even a telephoto/zoom won't help if (a) the water is crappy and/or (b) the light from your camera can't get to the subject. You have to get close.
The color balance from shooting ambient needs either your own light on the subject, or post-processing to adjuxst th white-balance, or both. The third shot -- of the tangs and the coral -- is over-exposed, possibly becasue your camera exposed for ambient light and then you added the flash on top of that.
NONE of these problems will be fixed by changing the camera.
 
I currently have a Costco Fujifilm XP-160 water camera which has been great for surf photography but now I take it diving and I'm finding it lacking. I can get descent pictures of fish but I really want to take nice macro shots of smaller fish and animals in the reef and I don't really want to break the bank at this moment. I just started diving and have a long list of gear to buy (wetsuit, computer, and mask are checked off haha).

Will the Olympus TG-6 really be an upgrade or am I just trading same for same? On paper the specs seem about the same, but I've read some threads where divers really love them. Any advice or recommendations would be appreciated.

These pictures of the nudi and crab are without flash and the last with.

 

Back
Top Bottom