Found a reg (second stage) in Millbrook Quarry
- Thread starter go62onair
- Start date
Please register or login
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
- Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
- A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
- You can make this box go away
H2Andy
Contributor
it was mine please
it was a regulator second stage
i lost it in Millbrook Quarry
it was a regulator second stage
i lost it in Millbrook Quarry
Froid
Contributor
Ok I know, but I have to ask this question. How do you lose a only second stage while diving? I guess it could just unscrew or break where the hose connects.
H2Andy
Contributor
this is a secret
you're probably trying to elicit information from me to claim the reg yourself
btw, this reg is the color of plastic and metal, and may or may not have interesting and identifying features on it
you're probably trying to elicit information from me to claim the reg yourself
btw, this reg is the color of plastic and metal, and may or may not have interesting and identifying features on it
It's mine. It has a mouthpiece, a diaphragm, is negatively buoyant and is not attached to a first stage.
I did not notice losing it because I was distracted by all the bubbles.
I did not notice losing it because I was distracted by all the bubbles.
H2Andy
Contributor
only slightly less known than the "i didn't see it with all the bubbles" excuse is the "some guy with a knife came by and cut off my hose" excuse
and i am not saying that markings or the absence thereof may or may not indicate a method of cutting and/or lack thereof, inasmuch as such time and other variables, vis a vis but not limited to physical inspection, may or may not determine beyond a quantum of evidenciary proof whether or not or if at all such methodology may or may not have been employed
and i am not saying that markings or the absence thereof may or may not indicate a method of cutting and/or lack thereof, inasmuch as such time and other variables, vis a vis but not limited to physical inspection, may or may not determine beyond a quantum of evidenciary proof whether or not or if at all such methodology may or may not have been employed
See...Andy cut my hose, so it has to be mine.
Besides, his sheep ratted him out.
Besides, his sheep ratted him out.
Similar threads
