Flying After Diving

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

There can never be agreement because individual human beings will have different risk tolerance. The guidlines are published by respected bodies to give a reasonable balance between risk and the needs of divers that wish to use aviation as a form of transport.

The overlooked aspect is the type of aviation which is just called "flying". Quite apart from the risk of the airplane crashing there is the additional risk of depressurisation of the passenger area - a very small risk of course. Commercial aircraft will fly at a lower altitude if this occurs and so the reduced ambient pressure is temporary.

No advice or guidline can take into account this variable. Nor the overall flight length (in time) during which any DCI cannot be treated.

The term "no fly" is therefore a rather imprecise one. The nitrogen load in slow tissue (itself only an hypothesis) could in theory cause DCI due to the lower ambient pressure of an aircraft or a land vehicle that climbs to altitude. Decompression models hypothesize that the nitrogen is excreted at a given rate and so after a period of time the tissue saturation is ambient.

The more you study the theory the more obvious it is that there are some assumptions that are at best questionable. Generally it is agreed to be cautious to minimise the risk. No one will be able to give a definative answer as there is no such answer.

The variables are too diverse for any meaningful number to be given. So it is a hunch, a guess. My guess is - you will be fine.
 
Algorithm in DCs typically doesn’t use Navy tables but much rougher guidelines. The answer from John is spot on.
What do you mean by "much rougher guidelines?" My understanding is that the difference between Navy tables, the PADI RDP, and subsequent computer-based algorithms is the use of a shorter (typically 60 minute) half-time for the longest tissue compartment. You make it sound like these algorithms are just taking some guesses.
 
DAN recomendations are much rougher than the Navy tables – they do not take into account how much the tissues are saturated. That being said, they are regarded as very safe so if you follow those you should be on the side of safety.

However, I have been in situations where I had to fly much sooner than those guidelines after multiple days of deep deco diving and used the Navy tables to assess how much oxygen I needed to breathe to be safe before boarding.
 
I volunteer at my local aquarium. I regularly dive the exhibits for cleaning and feeding. Depths range from 8-15 ft. Air supply is via hookah hose to compressor. Average dive time is 45 minutes. Can someone please advise whether usual flying after diving guidelines apply to these types of dives. I’m scheduled to work at the aquarium on Friday and then am flying on Saturday.
They don't. You are doing a 45 minute deco stop.
 
The variables are too diverse for any meaningful number to be given. So it is a hunch, a guess. My guess is - you will be fine.

This could be interpreted to mean, "if the answer is not exact then it is useless. You may as well just guess."
I hope you did not mean that, because it is a silly thing to say.
 
This could be interpreted to mean, "if the answer is not exact then it is useless. You may as well just guess."
I hope you did not mean that, because it is a silly thing to say.

I agree - the idea that an approximation is useless is wrong. It is however useful (well IMHO) to understand that the mathematical model of decompression is not based on hard science but an hypothesis. Buhlmann tested the model enough that it has real value for diving and is universally accepted as the best way to combat DCI.

Poor old Albert passed away before he could do the same for helium mixes and didn't do much in the "flying after diving" debate. Hence the personal opinion versus consensus that dominates that (and this) debate.

Belief that because the mathematical model works is proof that it is perfect is what is wrong.
 

Back
Top Bottom