Drilling holes in ships are actually a very involved regulatory compliance and inspection process as well...
What about following existing wires?
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Drilling holes in ships are actually a very involved regulatory compliance and inspection process as well...
StillWhat about following existing wires?
Every wire has a complex regulatory process. Basically, you cannot penetrate a watertight bulkhead without a watertight fitting installed, so you have to drill a hole, insert a watertight gland, and run your wire. Through every bulkhead.What about following existing wires?
Yes. That's why I referred to the best-achieved level of safety as just "tolerable", nothing better.Maybe... to some degree. I have dove off everything from WWII inflatable surplus life rafts to advanced DSVs (Diving Support Vessels) in the North Sea. They all have very different risks associated with them. There were 46 total commercial cargo ship losses around the world in 2018 with 2,698 reported incidents.
Well, through the hull into the water and in water tight bulkheads sure. But not so much when done intelligently and with proper procedure in the part that isn’t under water unless the vessel has sunk. Fire stopping is a really well developed technology, even if we keep finding contractors who don’t do it right.Drilling holes in ships are actually a very involved regulatory compliance and inspection process as well...
...So, no nightwatch.