ScubaSarus
Guest
Lets see
Not having a lifeguard when they knew and were told to have one.
Free diving that's immensely stress full on the cardiovascular system and without a spotter. Heck Apnea breath holding is dangerous to do in your living room. He should not have been allowed really to do so alone IMO. I doubt I would give my mask to someone to free dive alone. I would volunteer to spot for him or see if I can pair him up.
I see negligence here.
He came to the surface, rolled over and sank. Sounds like a blackout. If others saw him, a lifeguard most likely would have saw him and could have jumped in to pull him out.
Do people know for sure vis was only 4' that day ? Hardly a place that should even allow SCUBA IMO or free diving without a buddy.
I think $74k is quite a small settlement for this negligent act for disobeying the safety rules even though the deceased took a big risk also by not having a spotter in a dangerous sport.
People and even I at one point underestimate the dangers of free diving. I'm glad an experience freediver set me straight a few years back.
Obviously and expensive corner to cut and a fatal decision not to have a spotter maybe. Some of us take risks; at least I do at times and I know its unwise. SCUBA diving in its self is a risk. The legal earnest though seems to fall on the people that ran the water hole as the man's relatives are also suffering his loss and are seeking compensation.
Not having a lifeguard when they knew and were told to have one.
Free diving that's immensely stress full on the cardiovascular system and without a spotter. Heck Apnea breath holding is dangerous to do in your living room. He should not have been allowed really to do so alone IMO. I doubt I would give my mask to someone to free dive alone. I would volunteer to spot for him or see if I can pair him up.
I see negligence here.
He came to the surface, rolled over and sank. Sounds like a blackout. If others saw him, a lifeguard most likely would have saw him and could have jumped in to pull him out.
Do people know for sure vis was only 4' that day ? Hardly a place that should even allow SCUBA IMO or free diving without a buddy.
I think $74k is quite a small settlement for this negligent act for disobeying the safety rules even though the deceased took a big risk also by not having a spotter in a dangerous sport.
People and even I at one point underestimate the dangers of free diving. I'm glad an experience freediver set me straight a few years back.
Obviously and expensive corner to cut and a fatal decision not to have a spotter maybe. Some of us take risks; at least I do at times and I know its unwise. SCUBA diving in its self is a risk. The legal earnest though seems to fall on the people that ran the water hole as the man's relatives are also suffering his loss and are seeking compensation.
Last edited: