scubacalifornia
Contributor
Since I started diving last year, I've been using a PST steel 104 borrowed from a friend who now wants it back, so I'm faced with purchasing a tank. I was considering the PST E8-130, but the LDS called them today and delivery is quoted as Dec, 2004! I'm now considering the Faber 108, but am getting conflicting information on the buoyancy swing from full to empty.
Most of the tables I've come across on various websites show the 108 at -4.4 full and +3.4 empty. However, the LDS told me -8 full and neutral empty. They're actually selling the XS Scuba tank, which is made by Faber. And the XS Scuba website confirms the -8/neutral specification quoted by the LDS.
Can anyone help alleviate the confusion here? Is this tank really positively buoyant when empty? Also, if you are actually diving with a Faber 108 I would love your opinion. I'm mostly doing single tank shore dives off the So. Cal. coast, and have really come to like the PST 104 both for the extra capacity and that I'm only using 16lbs of lead with it (I weigh about 200 lbs).
Thanks!
Kevin
Most of the tables I've come across on various websites show the 108 at -4.4 full and +3.4 empty. However, the LDS told me -8 full and neutral empty. They're actually selling the XS Scuba tank, which is made by Faber. And the XS Scuba website confirms the -8/neutral specification quoted by the LDS.
Can anyone help alleviate the confusion here? Is this tank really positively buoyant when empty? Also, if you are actually diving with a Faber 108 I would love your opinion. I'm mostly doing single tank shore dives off the So. Cal. coast, and have really come to like the PST 104 both for the extra capacity and that I'm only using 16lbs of lead with it (I weigh about 200 lbs).
Thanks!
Kevin