BillP
Senior Member
Hi devjr:
Thanks for the attempt at clarification, and no offense taken (thanks for caring), but I'm afraid that what you're saying about the anatomy and pathophysiology of ear problems in divers still isn't clear at all, and for the most part your information appears inaccurate. I would suggest that your thoughts on the question at hand require further clarification.
While trying to get at accurate information might seem like "futzing around" to you, and it might be boring or frustrating to readers to have to wade through volumes of detritus to get at some good information, I would have to disagree that the process doesn't point to some practical benefit. I believe there is great potential benefit to dispelling misinformation and bad advice- especially to the original poster who might actually believe some of the things they read and pass it on to others.
I also appreciate your take on the purpose of this board and the workings of the Internet. I think that you would agree that while this board is indeed partly for the exchange of technical information (general or otherwise) and advice, the dispensing of accurate information and good advice should be the ultimate goal. Is it not a posters responsibility to refrain from dispensing bad advice on subjects they don't understand? Failing that, is it not other responsible board members' legitimate role to question when they see what looks like incorrect information or bad advice?
Which brings up a general Internet message board etiquette question that I hope you can help me with since you're so saavy and willing to help. In your opinion, when a poster on a message board does post incorrect technical information or gives bad advice (and does so on a semi-regular basis in certain subjects), it's pointed out to him, and he realizes what he's doing- should that poster contrive a multiple-post 8 paragraph manifesto trying to rationalize why he's correct and explaining that he somehow seems to have a right as a Good Samaritan to mislead people, while continuing to dispense incorrect information and causing lots of "futzing around" and boredom? Or should that poster admit that he really doesn't understand what he's talking about, refrain from offering technical information and advice on subjects he doesn't understand, and maybe even apologize for misleading the person asking the original question and causing such a ruckus? (Shouldn't that poster stick with offering "sympathetic words, entertainment, and anecdotes" and skip giving advice on the techincal stuff they don't understand?) Which is the better course of action in your opinion?
TIA,
Bill
Thanks for the attempt at clarification, and no offense taken (thanks for caring), but I'm afraid that what you're saying about the anatomy and pathophysiology of ear problems in divers still isn't clear at all, and for the most part your information appears inaccurate. I would suggest that your thoughts on the question at hand require further clarification.
While trying to get at accurate information might seem like "futzing around" to you, and it might be boring or frustrating to readers to have to wade through volumes of detritus to get at some good information, I would have to disagree that the process doesn't point to some practical benefit. I believe there is great potential benefit to dispelling misinformation and bad advice- especially to the original poster who might actually believe some of the things they read and pass it on to others.
I also appreciate your take on the purpose of this board and the workings of the Internet. I think that you would agree that while this board is indeed partly for the exchange of technical information (general or otherwise) and advice, the dispensing of accurate information and good advice should be the ultimate goal. Is it not a posters responsibility to refrain from dispensing bad advice on subjects they don't understand? Failing that, is it not other responsible board members' legitimate role to question when they see what looks like incorrect information or bad advice?
Which brings up a general Internet message board etiquette question that I hope you can help me with since you're so saavy and willing to help. In your opinion, when a poster on a message board does post incorrect technical information or gives bad advice (and does so on a semi-regular basis in certain subjects), it's pointed out to him, and he realizes what he's doing- should that poster contrive a multiple-post 8 paragraph manifesto trying to rationalize why he's correct and explaining that he somehow seems to have a right as a Good Samaritan to mislead people, while continuing to dispense incorrect information and causing lots of "futzing around" and boredom? Or should that poster admit that he really doesn't understand what he's talking about, refrain from offering technical information and advice on subjects he doesn't understand, and maybe even apologize for misleading the person asking the original question and causing such a ruckus? (Shouldn't that poster stick with offering "sympathetic words, entertainment, and anecdotes" and skip giving advice on the techincal stuff they don't understand?) Which is the better course of action in your opinion?
TIA,
Bill