ItsBruce
Contributor
I hate to say it, but many lawyers figure that the best way to find out if someone has deep pockets is to sue them and find out. Unfortunately, its not much more difficult to sue 5 people instead of 3 and then to shake a few of of the non-deep pockets down for enough money to fund the suit against the real deep pockets.
Part of the problem is that law schools are graduating so many people that there are more lawyers than good cases. That means those who aren't good enough to get good cases, have to invent them. The other part of the problem is that people have been so desensitized to stupid lawsuits and huge verdicts that when they serve on juries, they are willing to give huge verdicts on stupid cases. This, of course, only serves to embolden the scavangers. (Scavangers means people who figure that they should get a million dollars because they got a scratch as well as the lawyers who will take their cases.) (If I ever get like that, drown me.)
End rant.
Part of the problem is that law schools are graduating so many people that there are more lawyers than good cases. That means those who aren't good enough to get good cases, have to invent them. The other part of the problem is that people have been so desensitized to stupid lawsuits and huge verdicts that when they serve on juries, they are willing to give huge verdicts on stupid cases. This, of course, only serves to embolden the scavangers. (Scavangers means people who figure that they should get a million dollars because they got a scratch as well as the lawyers who will take their cases.) (If I ever get like that, drown me.)
End rant.