Ayisha
Contributor
Those are some serious accusations. Have they been documented by police?
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
....Also he has changed his story several times about Mrs Watson knocking his mask off and regulator out of his mouth as she was "swept away".
I'm a Rescue Diver living in Townsville, Queensland. I've dived the Yongala a number of times...
The word around town is that Mr Watson was seen by a witness from a different boat (Jazz III) holding Mrs Watson in a bear hug with her face close to his chest for several minutes. It has been asserted that Mr Watson had turned off Mrs Watson's air and held her close to prevent her from spitting her reg out. It is alleged Mr Watson had not realised there were divers from another boat on the wreck, and he did not realise they could see him (vis was only about 12 metres).
The DM that rescued Mrs Watson said that her mask and regulator were still in place, and if she had simply passed out, she would still be breathing. An autopsy revealed no obstruction in her airways and only very little water was found on her lungs.
In the Townsville Bulletin today, an article reporting on the inquest has stated that there have been a number of inconsistencies with regard to Mr Watson's claim he could not go down to rescue his wife because he was having severe barotrauma. However, two separate medical assessments by a Townsivlle Doctor and a New Zealand doctor suggests his ear trauma was no more than mild. Also he has changed his story several times about Mrs Watson knocking his mask off and regulator out of his mouth as she was "swept away".
I must say I am hesitant to give this man the assumption of innocence until proven guilty.... I know if my husband were to suffer any trouble under water, I would certainly put myself in severe danger before I would just let him sink away from me.
"Rescue Diver" just means the person has done at least 24 dives, of those at least 13 of them would have been in training themselves with an instructor".
It doesn't mean they have any experience of real world diving - in theory a rescue diver may only have done 11 dives to 6m in a quarry without being part of a course.
I saw a man and whoman wrestling on the wing of a submerged plane. When they left the wing (facing up and kicking toward the surface) they sunk several more feet down to the silty bottom and the whole place blew out in a monster silt cloud. When they finally did begine to ascend they tried to do a moon-shoot. Somewhere in all this they abandoned their young son who was diving with them.
As I read that, there is no min required number of dives if the diver is a PAD AOW diver. The requirement for 20 dives is only mentioned in the definition of "equivalence" of PADI AOW. You could start rescue training with as few as 9 dives all being training dives in PADI classes (OW and AOW). Most of the rescue class is on the surface so it doesn't really add much in the way of diving.
In either case, best case scenario here you have a guy with minimum 11 unsupervised dives (all of which could have been guided!) so not overly relevent.