The issue is currently with work cover so spreading BS like the posts above will serve no purpose other than to further alienate against the industry. You are talking out of your rear picking up on rumors and running with them. Best not to say anything at all if you don't know the facts, and in regards to the guys cousin, if he doesn't dive then he probably doesn't know whether it's air, O2 or a mix, and it really doesn't matter.
Send your thoughts to the poor guy rather than speculating on what you consider the problem was, as I said, as far as what is FACT at this point is that there was an accident and someone was injured, that's it!
We are not talking about alienation here, but isolation.
Isolate this dive shop out on it’s own somewhere if these clowns want to fill 26 year old cylinders in a busy shopping street with only a plate glass window out front as the blast shield.
As for your suggestion its an industry, it’s not. It looks like a shop to me and one that can’t fill a tank safely.
As for Worksafe now I trust they look at the shops set up very carefully.
The cylinder filling logs, the filling set up repair logs, The service history of the equipment. Who did the servicing how are they qualified. The last gauge calibration test. etc etc
The “Industry” standard written risk assesment would have required adequate equipment in order to keep an operator safe while at work and identified this cylinder prior to filling unless of course regardless it turns out that the cylinder in question for paintball was a back door fill as a free “mate rates”.
Non the less the operators duty of care would conclude a subsequent blast in a filling blast cabinet would have been a better $5000 alternative that the consequent damage to life and limb.
Written evidence of relevant competence and training of the operators and management.
Written evidence of each relevant filling equipment component of its suitability age, service history. A filling SOP and a written risk assessment. etc etc
I suggest this dive shop starts typing them up and fast.
And if that don’t rock your boat just for starters, a reminder that our collective responsibility in this industry and forum and at our respective work sites is our duty of care to others to advise inform discuss and educate others in managing risks found within our daily occupational hazards and having our respective employers provide adequate safety equipment components and plant with which we can safely conduct our required work.
Finally in rely to your last paragraph I can’t help this poor lad, I don’t speculate but I will do all I can to help the next chap filling a cylinder at work for pay, yourself included.