Yeah... on their original plot both ZH-L@10/100 and Fused RGBM got the diver out of the water at around 1:20, while you have 1:40. So much for their infografic. But anyway, now it looks like they turned the knobs a bit too much and their deep stops are now shallower, and the shallow ones are longer, than the competition. Gotta wonder how many goats died for that profile.
dive computers and reverse profiles
- Thread starter stepfen
- Start date
Please register or login
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
- Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
- A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
- You can make this box go away
Yeah... on their original plot both ZH-L@10/100 and Fused RGBM got the diver out of the water at around 1:20, while you have 1:40. So much for their infografic. But anyway, now it looks like they turned the knobs a bit too much and their deep stops are now shallower, and the shallow ones are longer, than the competition. Gotta wonder how many goats died for that profile.
Yes, I meant comparing Fused 2 to Fused no-number -- or to ZH-L16@10/100 as a proxy for the latter (but then you'd have to use the dive from page 7 as we have no idea how 10/100 matches to Fused-no-number on any other profile).
I'm a bit hesitant to try to make a direct comparison to the infographic they provided, as I don't know what parameters, what gasses, if the different algorithms somehow treat that differently, etc.
It is interesting to see that the fused rgbm 2 is fairly similar, at least on that one made up dive profile, to the 68/82 numbers.
Similar threads
