LOL, No, I don't care to support my claim. Read the above non-sense...
How about this line: "The average DIN orings sees less dives and is changed during annual service as opposed to the yoke rental tank one that rarely gets changed unless is fails or looks really bad."
I'm pretty sure that's a regional guess. Go to Cave Country where every single tank at every single dive shop is DIN. It's a section of the country where we dive year round. Really? Less dives? That's funny.
Head to the technical operators in Pompano or Key Largo where 70% of the tanks are DIN. Less Dives Really? That's just silly.
Guys, if 2000 cave divers are using DIN, it's not for any reason except that it's safer.
You read the post wrong. He said DIN
o-rings sees less dives then Yoke
o-rings. Not tanks, which makes sense. Yoke o-ring is on the tank, so every time a rental yoke tank goes out, it see a dive. A rental tank can be used by more than one person a day. And yoke o-ring only gets replace when necessary. DIN o-ring is on the reg, it definitely see less dives than rental tanks.
---------- Post added April 13th, 2013 at 11:33 AM ----------
For single tank setup, I will suggest Yoke. You don't/shouldn't do any deco or overhead with this setup, so the "more secured connection" advantage isnt a practical concern. Instead, the advantage of yoke is convinient. You can be sure you will get yoke rental anywhere, but not so for DIN. With yoke converter attached, all advantage of DIN goes down the drain. It is actually a worse setup with both native DIN or Yoke.
I think a blanket statement like DIN is better because cave tech divers use them is just not correct. Cave and tech also use double, stage bottle, argon, canister light, drysuit (even in warm water).... because for their application, these item make a differences. For rec diver, I won't say these are necessary better equipments.