Design your own OW class!

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

In my opinion the class should concentrate on teaching fundamental diving skills involving repetitive practice. In the majority of my ocean dives in my OW and AOW classes, we basically went in, did a few exercises if any, and the majority of the dive consisted of an underwater tour. While at the time this was all wonderfull since most student divers just can't wait to start exploring around under water. Now, I feel cheated, having missed the opportunity to learn and practice better skills with an instructor, which is what I was really paying for.

Emphasis on:

Ascents
Descents
Buoyancy
Trim
Proper Weight
Swimming position
Kicks
Gas management
Decompression stops ( safety )
Gear configuration
General dive safety ( equipment, conditions, etc.)

This, along with other fundamental diving qualities that I have probably left out, is what should be taught with more than passing mention and one or two demonstrations.

A diver which is able to practice these skills with some degree of competency will then be able to start exploring and tackling different underwater conditions requiring new skills without having to also fumble through the basics.

I think a lot of the blame for poor training has to go to the new divers, as I mentioned I was more than eager to just swim around underwater on my first dive. On the other hand this is partly due to the way diving is marketed to the general public. Where the emphasis is presented as exploring the underwater world with training just a brief mere formality to get you there.

Peter
 
Hello everyone,

Unlike most of the instructors on this board who work for shops, I have the complete ability to design my own class. I teach two community college classes that are six weeks long. We meet two nights a week from 7-10. One night lecture, one night pool per week. I have tought the "fast paced weekend classes" before, and quite frankly I hate them. Not only do they place a undue amount of stress on the student for the amount of information and skills to learn, but also on the instructor for the amount of time that they have to bring these students up to an "acceptable" level of skill. Unfortunately, these classes represent our society's "I need it now" attitude. People are not willing to put the time and effort into something to fully learn. They want to just "hit the high points" and learn just enough to get by. Anyway, sorry for getting off on a rant.

I really love teaching the college courses. They are relaxed, slow paced, and everyone has a good time. I have the time to add personal insights, and play many games. I can not begin to tell you how big a difference this makes in general comfort level and skills.

I teach through an agency that really takes a beating on this board. I feel this is totally not justified. Although I do have some issues about the agency's direction and focus, I do not have a problem with their educational programs. In fact, I feel they are some of the best developed in the industry. The standards in these programs are minimum. It is MY responsibility as the instructor to build on these minimum standards with MY insight and MY skills to develop MY the divers under MY care. Quite frankly, if I produce poor divers it is MY fault, not the agency's. With that said, I would stack the divers that I have certified up against divers from ANY agency.

I don't "fail" students. I do take them aside and recommend that they come back and do some more pool sessions. Quite frankly, they are often well aware of their short comings and relieved that you pointed it out. I was really lucky to have "come up through the ranks" with the instructors that I did. They all made themselves available to go diving with me when ever I asked. I can not begin to tell you how much this helped in my development as a diver. I try to do the same with my students.

Anyway, I have ranted on enough. Basically, the course is as good as YOU make it no matter what agency's name is on the card.
 
I realize that more time means more money, but it also means more practice and more comfort/confidence.

I like the ideal of two nights a week(for how ever many weeks it takes). That gives time for reading and mulling over the material outside of class allows for in-depth discussion in the class.

I like agencies that give the instructor the "leeway" to add to the class. My BOW even familiarized us with decompression tables. They don't/can't advocate decompression diving, but we knew what to do IF we crossed the NDL.

Just some thoughts,

Jarhead
 
My turn...

As most know I am an instructor. Here is a partial description of what we have done, what we want to do and why. This board has been a significant resource and that’s part of the reason I am posting this.

First some statements of how I perceive things.

I don’t believe current standards prevent a good class.
I don’t believe current standards insure a good class.

I do believe the following do prevent good training:
1, There are market pressures to shorten and cheapen training. I won’t list them but they come from both manufacturers of equipment and the customer as well as other competition
2, An instructors idea of what good training is will be, to some extent, based on his/her own training. Many instructors have little (dive) training beyond AOW. Think about it. A DM or instructor course teaches supervision and how to teach. What additional training do they have in the basics such as trim, equipment configuration, propulsion techniques and so on and so on. Have you ever heard of a recreational instructor candidate failing because of poor trim, fining technique or silting as a result? Is an instructor ever asked to remove and replace a mask while maintaining depth and trim? Can a diver of this level develop other divers of this level? Yes. Is this good enough? IMO, most divers and instructors don’t know the difference because that’s all they have seen.

Over the past several years as I have attempted to run a DS and as I’ve continued my own training and experience I couldn’t help but notice that the divers around me just flat out stink. I don’t just mean a little off, I mean rotgut bad. I noticed that the instructors didn’t look so hot either. The students do it like the instructor. Here is the real kicker…my students were diving just like the rest. But wait, I was doing everything right. Well, the way I was taught anyway.

I started to look at what I think the end product should be and the process that produces it. I also spoke with and stole ideas from people like Jarrod Jablonski and other instructors I know that have stopped teaching for dive shops out of disgust. I started evaluating the standards with respect to what is actually required and what is left to the discretion of the instructor. For instance, we must have students swim neutrally buoyant. We can have them properly trimmed if we want. We can teach a frog and modified frog kick if we want. We must have them hover. We can have them balanced and trimmed to hover horizontally if we want. We must demonstrate skills like reg recovery/clearing, mask remove/replace and air sharing. We may demonstrate these skills while kneeling on the bottom if we want or we can demonstrate them while hovering horizontally and maintaining depth. We can insist on good buddy skills if we want. Many say that an instructor is diving solo. The instructor may be the responsible party and have the most experience in the group but if pool and classroom training were successful nobody should be solo.

The above opinions and observations led to some no-brainer type changes. The changes started in the classroom. It is the instructor’s job to show application for the material.
I show video of recreational divers in the Caribbean. I point out the poor trim, total lack of buddy teams, the poor buoyancy control and the dangling equipment. Also obvious, is the damage to the reef. I also show footage of cave divers. I don’t do this to promote cave diving but to show proper trim, buoyancy control and team diving. Eventually I will get some video of these skills outside of a cave. I also show a video called “A Deceptively easy Way to Die”. I do this to keep them out of caves and all other environments that they are not trained for. In lecture I explain the mechanics of balance and trim and show what equipment and techniques we use to manage them. We illustrate the consequences of poor trim and buoyancy control. I talk about how basic skills affect ones ability to cope with a problem and avoid problems in the first place. I give personal accounts of real world examples. I talk about different methods of donating air, my experiences with them and why we teach it the way we do (Hogarthian).

In the Pool
We added some time and adjusted the cost accordingly. There is time each session for practice and play. We use a buoyancy control course and various mask games to have fun, reinforce good technique and keep repetition interesting.

From the beginning, no staff member ever touches the bottom. All skills are demonstrated while holding depth and trim. I can’t teach hovering this early but if students emulate us (and some do) I don’t stop them. If needed students are allowed (not encouraged) to use the bottom during early skill practice. At this stage it is more important to learn the mechanics such as learning to breath under water, clearing a reg and mask or recovering a reg. When we demonstrate UW swimming we do not stress the flutter but the frog and modified frog. I also demonstrate turns and reverse kicks. Interesting enough, divers seem to naturally want to flutter. I guess this is from past swimming experience. They get over it.

When we get to neutral buoyant swimming we move tanks and weights to help achieve proper trim. We continue these efforts when we teach hovering. Hovering is done in a horizontal position and then more swimming. From here on we avoid the bottom completely. Good buddy skills are stressed throughout and in fact I have some new ideas to reinforce team concepts. Every class is a beta version it seems.

OW is more of the same except we are less forgiving when it comes to buddy and situational awareness. In a course of this length these skill are not mastered but a new diver will know what it looks like and be well on their way. At this point they can choose which video they wish star in.

In addition we plan to get video capability. Video has been used as a training aid for years in sports and even public speaking it would be silly not to use it.

We are considering offering a follow-up class with the sole purpose of refining and polishing these same skills.

In answer to the suggestion of free classes, forget it. We all must eat. My time is valuable to my family and me and if it isn’t valuable to the student they should go elsewhere.

We have made similar changes in AOW and rescue classes but maybe that should be another thread.

I welcome flames, criticisms and suggestions.
 
Mike

I believe most new divers are destined to have trouble with bouyancy control and balance until they are comfortable with their gear and environment and able to control their breathing. This takes experience. Not too much for many and some will never get there.

I see nothing wrong with introducing these concepts in BOW but I think it will require excessive time to begin to seriously master these skills at that stage.
 
I have been following this thread with interest. I agree a longer class would be helpful. I have one question though...Define when a skill is mastered? I think the problem with training may have alot with how you define that question....
 
MikeFerrara once bubbled...

We are considering offering a follow-up class with the sole purpose of refining and polishing these same skills.

Mike,
I think this is an excellent idea. I know a NAUI instructor who offers a program such as this. It really helps clear up the confusion most new students seem to experience right after BOW. His class is similiar to the DIRF class. Good luck with it. I think it's worth the effort.
 
It would be interesting to know if a basic skills follow up class could be succesfull from a business as well as customer point of view. From my personal experience I would think there is definitely a demand for supervised diving and skill practice and improvement after BOW. I think this is the reason many students go onto AOW right away.

A Basic Skills Proficiency class, where a diver could gain pratice, competency and confidence by learning how to correctly perform diving skills as he/she progresses does not exist today, as far as I know, from any of the major training organization.

I am thinking in terms of a non-conventional class. After all skill proficiency takes time and pratice. I am not referring to skill mastery, but demonstrable skill prificiency. Something which is measureable by difining standards.

My ideal class would be spread out over time in order for the student to be able to practice on his own and improve. The class would basically consist of the instructor observing the student while he performs various skills, offering feedback, along with techiques to improve, helping to promote early on good behavior and technique; thus preventing bad habits. This would also possibly expose the student to different diving conditions where the instructor could re-inforce or offer helpfull advise.

On the subject of profits, while everyone in business does so for money. Many businesses are so focused on immediate return that they end up diminishing their future profits. This is a fine balancing act. I'll just mention that many large corporations place a premium on attracting new, first time customers, and keeping them. Whenever a diveshop trains a new diver they have the potential to develop a long term customer who may spend many thousands of dollars with them in the future.

I think many LDS's are to busy trying to mold the customer to their ways, instead of trying to find a way to profit from servicing the customer's needs.

I admire those who are willing to brake out of the mold. Good luck to you Mike Ferrara.

Peter
 
I've been reading through this thread and it seems to me that what is the consensus is that there should be more dives, more pool and more class and that it should be free or cost less.

Stepping out of the dark whrer mushrooms are qrown maybe someone should offer a suggestions as to how and whi is to foot the bill for it all.

An instructor now doesn't make a living wage without his percentage of gear sales. Where is the fluff that you think can be cut?

Should there be no full time instructors?

I was in a couple of chapters of the BS-AC and they share gear, pool expenses, and teach long courses. Who in theUS would commit to three or four months of pool training once a week, then ten or fifteen snorkle dives, all the while keeping up the one night a week pool sessions, then a few nights of testing, then a bunch of OW dives...

The problem is not the technique, BS-AC has a great program, but it is based on a population that will commit the better part of a year learning to dive. That isn't the market in the US. Most people want to get through training in a week or two. It is after you got your c-card that you finally realized that you didn't know it all. After you became a diver you then knew what you need to improve on.

Knowing what you know now you would do it differently, but would you have signed up for the first class back when you thought you wanted to complete the course in two weeks so you go on vacation to some southern dive eden?
 
I would really like to see an added emphasis on reading and using gauges and compasses in OW classes. I'm not an instructor, and I'm not sure what the best way to accomplish this would be, but I feel very strongly that these skills need to be added or strengthened in the BOW course. Below are some ideas that MIGHT be useful for teaching/emphasizing/practicing gauge and compass skills, but I've never had the opportunity to try them with students. I don't have a really strong bias as to HOW these skills should be taught; I just think that they need to be taught effectively.

It would be great if students had to practice navigating a course in the pool. They could also measure and count kick-cycles for this exercise. For pressure gauges, maybe the instructor should signal for everyone to check their air pressure every 5 minutes or so THROUGHOUT every pool session, so that students develop the habit of checking their air every few minutes right from the start. As to depth gauge proficiency, the only thing I can think of is to combine it with practicing slow ascents and descents, and have them practice keeping a safe, slow rate, sometimes using a fixed reference, and sometimes watching their depth gauges (and maybe also sometimes by watching their bubbles.)

As I said, I am not an instructor, so I haven't had a chance to try using any of these methods to teach students. I'd love to hear comments and alternate suggestions from others.

otter-cat
 

Back
Top Bottom