D90 v D700

[Chuck Tribolet]

They really are completely different bodies. The price difference alone is enough to say they aren't comparable.

They have to be very different bodies. The full-frame sensor in the D700
wouldn't fit in the D90 (or D300).

The 10.5 still isn't wide enough (I'm spoiled by the 13 on my RS).

 

[bet]

They have to be very different bodies. The full-frame sensor in the D700
wouldn't fit in the D90 (or D300).

When I used the term "bodies" I was talking in the general sense of DSLR camera bodies not the actual physical size of the bodies. Aside from sensor and size there are some striking systems differences that don't have anything to do with the sensor (i.e. autofocus system used, 3d tracking, video, programable buttons, ISO capabilities, seals, materials, fps, LV modes, matrix metering systems, etc.).

While the differences in the FX and DX sensors make comparisons difficult, there are other differences that also must be considered that further make comparisons between the D700 and D90 difficult. The D90 is an exceptional camera is really considered the top of the line of the consumer/pro-sumer Nikon line while the D700 is firmly in the professional line offered from Nikon. The bottom line is the D700 is a superior DSLR camera body when compared to the D90 (and the price reflects this). However the D90 has its place and is more than enough camera for many shooters.

The point I was trying to make (all be it poorly) was that the D90 and D700 are very different cameras and that the sensor is not the only difference.

 

[Christian]

They have to be very different bodies. The full-frame sensor in the D700
wouldn't fit in the D90 (or D300).

The D90 is very different. But the D300 and D700 bodies are very similar in size, feel and functionality. The D700 is about 8-9 mm higher, a couple of mm thicker and a little heavier, but not much. Basically, they do the same job but with different sensors.

/c

 

[AussieByron]

Hi Scott,

Another option for you is if your starting from scratch in a DLSR setup (ie dont have any lenses of one brand) I would be looking straight at the Canon 5D mark II. (Canon 5D Mark II)

Yes I know this is a Nikon section of the forum but the only thing that comes close to the Canon 5D mk II is the Nikon D3x which is alot more money. The Canon is only $200 more than the D700!

If any Nikon user can think of the better camera than the Canon 5D mkII in the Nikon range for the same money please let us know.

You will be entering straight into full frame sensors and non digital lenses (still can use DX lens but they are cropped down to about 10mb).

Ikelite make a housing for the Canon and its about the same price as the rest of the Dslr range ($1500-1600).

As for ports there isnt a one port that will do all the work for you. Normally you just have a flat port for your macro (flat port magnifies your shot) and dome for wide angle (dome needed so that there isnt any vignetting).

Also if your going for Ikelite, they have a a modular port system now which you can buy. MODULAR PORT SYSTEM

For non digital lenses i would be looking at the Canon 100m macro and maybe the 16mm for wide angle.

Something to think about if your looking at spending the money now on a setup.

Regards Mark

 

[AussieByron]

It would have to be a relatively minor diopter (I think), and it would
have to be just the right dome port. I've never heard of anybody
shooting macro with a dome port.

Alot of people shoot macro with the Sigma 17-70mm Macro lens behind a dome port.

Its not a dedicated macro lens but more of a general purpose lens. Doesnt do a great job at either end of the focal scale.

Regards Mark

 

[D_O_H]

Thanks for all the helpful advice! Just put in my order for the D90, the 18-200 and the 60mm AFD and a Tokina 10-17mm. Just need to find a housing now..

 

[AussieByron]

Thanks for all the helpful advice! Just put in my order for the D90, the 18-200 and the 60mm AFD and a Tokina 10-17mm. Just need to find a housing now..

I have exactly the same setup and I am very happy with it.

Regards Mark

 

[Mariozi]

Nicely chosen.