- Messages
- 16,510
- Reaction score
- 5,297
- # of dives
- 1000 - 2499
--not using chemicals, bleach: Good idea, but not something you do while diving anyway. General advice for the world population.Reducing your ecological impact is pretty damn easy... There's nothing new to that.
Environmental impact of aviation - Wikipedia is part of it.
Recycling.
Not using chemicals unless absolutely needed. How many times do we see people use bleach when they could just scrub for 1 minute instead...
Not going to places where the oceans are considered a garbage can... Maldive photos show mountains of plastic bottles washed up on islands | Daily Mail Online (see all those bottles in the pictures? Many of those can easily be recycled, even without infrastructures)
Not taking a dive boat if we can, you can do pretty damn good shore dives. Most of those claiming you need a boat to dive are the ones that never dived from shore in the first place.
Forget Indonesia, you have not even seen your local species!
@TMHeimer "There are those who say taking DEAD shells from a beach really hurts the ecology because those shells will break down and... etc. These are not the big problems."
No... there are species that go from shell to shell, which could have made good use the one you just took out because "look ma! so beautiful!"
--Not taking a boat: Good idea but not practical. Some places shore diving does suck and some people live miles even from the local quarry that sucks (you're probably not gunna spend tons of $ to fly somewhere to shore dive only, so totally eliminating boat diving is impractical. You would also have to address ALL boats in the ocean, of which dive boats are only a tiny %).
--Species using empty shells: Are you aware of the populations of the various types of Hermit Crabs?-- well, not infinite, but pretty close. I'm not a kid, I am a shell collector since 1969 with a labelled collection (but no need to rehash all the old threads of 10 years ago on that).