Coating soft weights

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Would there be some other possibility. I would have to look at the table of elements, what about alloys of Bismuth?

I checked:

Iron has an atomic number of 26, Lead of 82 and Bismuth of 83, so it is even heavier than Lead and AFAIK, not toxic.

Density of lead is 11.35, bismuth is 9.78 and steel is 8.0.
 
So what's the problem with using lead?
 
That was also the suggestion of Muddiver. It's a coating for tools but I'm not sure how much strength is would have in this application. I've used it for coating the finger-tips of dive glove, but again the strength here was provided by the underlying glove.

I hope someone tries it and reports back.

Adam

Tool Dip has been used by many to coat hard weights, but I don't see that working out well for soft weights.
 
Tool Dip has been used by many to coat hard weights, but I don't see that working out well for soft weights.

Can you explain why not?
 
Honestly, with lead weights just placed in a quick release pocket, how much lead is being released into the water. How much lead is a person getting in their system by handling unsealed lead weights.

I certainly understand the problems associated with kids eating paint chips with lead in them but I have never heard of lead weights just being handled or lead weights suspended in a pocket during a dive posing an environmental hazard.

Lead shotgun shot that is released to lay on the bottom of ponds along with lead sinkers that are lost to the lake from a fishing line is one thing. But lead that is just floating around with a diver for an hour or less, I just haven't ever heard that this poses a danger to anyone.

I have also never heard of a dive professional being diagnosed with lead poisoning due to handling lead weights over the course of a career. Am I living in a cave?

I'm all for doing things to keep from harming the environment but I'm almost inclined to believe that toxins released from whatever someone might use to coat/paint the lead with might be worse than the lead.
 
So I decided to take the self-help route and do some research. According to some articles on wikipedia and scubadivingpro.org it seems that there is a very low risk associated with both handling weights or having uncoated lead in the water while diving.

Basically, in order to be a hazard, the lead has to be ingested either as a powder or has to be introduced to the blood through a wound. So solid weights only present a hazard to people that are exposed to them on a long term basis (dive professionals) IF they make a habit of handling the weights and then putting their hands in their mouth without washing them.

Even the scary cloud of lead discharge that someone mentioned when rinsing their soft weights is apparently not all that big of a problem due to some sort of chemical process that occurs when the discharge bonds with the water around it. As long as you make a habit of rinsing your soft lead weights with fresh water after you dive, even that is not really a big deal.

So I'm going to stand by my theory (note that I said "theory") that the potential for harm is increased by using paint or some other untested coating product.

As one article stated, "It appears that the greatest danger one faces when handling lead dive weights occurs when wearing flip-flops."

I welcome any opposing views based on research results. Not against changing if it is warranted.
 

Back
Top Bottom