I've found as much as I could through searching the board.
Now I'm looking for the DIR answer, since I usually find the answers to be well reasoned with an explanation "why".
Let me start by saying that I plan on taking the DIR-F class.
Just for reference, I was looking at DUI suits at my LDS. Specifically, the TLS350, CLx450 and CF200. I don't mean to make my questions brand specific, but it does give us a reference point for discussion.
I like the idea of the trilam suit drying more quickly, but I keep reading that the crushed neoprene suit is "much" more durable. I've also read that crushed neoprene is a bad idea because of the suit's compression at depth as well as the evaporative cooling effect that may chill you during a windy surface interval.
At some point in the future, I would like to wreck dive (with proper training) and some of the comments I've read refer to the TLS350 getting somewhat shredded in a wreck. By the way, I have visions of someone going through a wreck like a steel ball in a pinball machine. This can't be right! :11:
I've read posts where many wreck divers seem to be more fond of the CF200 because of its durability in this environment filled with sharp features that could damage a suit. On the otherhand, I read that it takes 2 days to dry your suit and that it's not a great suit to travel with because of its weight.
I've read other posts that mention that although DUI claims the CLx450 is more durable than the TLS350, that the CLx450 is just too stiff and becomes restrictive of your movement without really being much more resiliant to damage.
So, on to my questions and a public display of my ignorance on the subject.
1) Wouldn't the compressibility of a crushed neoprene suit be a moot point since you inflate your drysuit anyway? It seems that compression of air would take place whether it was "in" the suit or "inside" the suit and that any issues would be tied more to the amount of suit inflation.
2) Do some people successfully use a trilam shell as opposed to crushed neoprene shell in a wreck environment and given the opportunity to do it over, would they have purchased a crushed neoprene suit instead?
3) Has anyone switched from the TLS350 to the CLx450 or visa versa and if so, which did you like better and why? (I know I got brand specific on that one, but those were the suits I was looking at and I would like the feedback. I would like to say that at this point, I am open to any other brand. However, I've found that DUI seems to have the best reputation.)
Thanks in advance for any help you can give me to further my understanding with part or all of my questions.
Christian
Now I'm looking for the DIR answer, since I usually find the answers to be well reasoned with an explanation "why".
Let me start by saying that I plan on taking the DIR-F class.
Just for reference, I was looking at DUI suits at my LDS. Specifically, the TLS350, CLx450 and CF200. I don't mean to make my questions brand specific, but it does give us a reference point for discussion.
I like the idea of the trilam suit drying more quickly, but I keep reading that the crushed neoprene suit is "much" more durable. I've also read that crushed neoprene is a bad idea because of the suit's compression at depth as well as the evaporative cooling effect that may chill you during a windy surface interval.
At some point in the future, I would like to wreck dive (with proper training) and some of the comments I've read refer to the TLS350 getting somewhat shredded in a wreck. By the way, I have visions of someone going through a wreck like a steel ball in a pinball machine. This can't be right! :11:
I've read posts where many wreck divers seem to be more fond of the CF200 because of its durability in this environment filled with sharp features that could damage a suit. On the otherhand, I read that it takes 2 days to dry your suit and that it's not a great suit to travel with because of its weight.
I've read other posts that mention that although DUI claims the CLx450 is more durable than the TLS350, that the CLx450 is just too stiff and becomes restrictive of your movement without really being much more resiliant to damage.
So, on to my questions and a public display of my ignorance on the subject.
1) Wouldn't the compressibility of a crushed neoprene suit be a moot point since you inflate your drysuit anyway? It seems that compression of air would take place whether it was "in" the suit or "inside" the suit and that any issues would be tied more to the amount of suit inflation.
2) Do some people successfully use a trilam shell as opposed to crushed neoprene shell in a wreck environment and given the opportunity to do it over, would they have purchased a crushed neoprene suit instead?
3) Has anyone switched from the TLS350 to the CLx450 or visa versa and if so, which did you like better and why? (I know I got brand specific on that one, but those were the suits I was looking at and I would like the feedback. I would like to say that at this point, I am open to any other brand. However, I've found that DUI seems to have the best reputation.)
Thanks in advance for any help you can give me to further my understanding with part or all of my questions.
Christian