Channel Island fishing restrictions

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

smotrs

Registered
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Location
Covina, CA.
# of dives
500 - 999
Not sure how many people are aware, but recently , Wednesday Oct. 23 the California Fish and Game Commision permanently banned fishing across 175sq miles of ocean around the Channel Islands which will go into effect on Jan. 1. There's a bit of a story on Yahoo regarding it and the full story can be found on the LA Times website regarding it.

Any thoughts?
 
A free version of the article is also available at the San Francisco Chronicle:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2002/10/24/MN222562.DTL&type=science

The LA Times link is for subscribers only.

I think it's a great idea - there's incidental evidence of fishing catches around (not in) marine reserves increasing, which keeps fishermen happy, plus it provides, well, a marine reserve. Think of it as a national park for the fish.

According to the Chronicle article, only 0.02% of Californian waters are protected, versus an international average of 1% (still a pitifully small amount). The ocean may be considered a renewable resource, but mankind is stripping it far faster than it can replenish itself. Here's a useful link to a page that lists good, ok, and bad seafood to eat, in environmental terms:

http://www.calacademy.org/calwild/winter2002/stories/fish2_table.html
 
Good catch on the Chronicle story, I'm down in the LA area which is why I didn't catch the run in the SF Chronicle. Thanks for adding that link. As for the content, sounds pretty much the same as what was in the LA Times article.
 
I attended a couple of meetings in the Long Beach area the DFG was holding. The commercial fishermen outnumbered the pro-reserves almost 2 to 1 I would say.

I like the idea of the marine reserves for a number of reasons but my 2 biggest reasons were the depletion of some species to almost extinction and the thrill one gets when they dive in a marine reserve/preserve and see the abundance of different marine life.

My hats off to DFG and glad to see Davis did at least one thing right by signing it into law.
 

Back
Top Bottom