Yes, with a lot of "ands". One big one: there are a lot of facilities in the US (and I'm sure outside) that have properly trained hyperbaric physicians and are quite capable of treating emergent indications but are not equipped to manage critically ill patients in the chamber. There's a good example in your neck of the woods: a hospital in the Denver metro area can take emergent hyperbaric indications but isn't equipped to manage critically ill patients in the chamber. The closest hyperbaric facilities to you with critical care capability are in Salt Lake City. There's a complex risk-benefit calculus that goes into deciding when and where to treat a hyperbaric patient who may decompensate. Treat in the closer chamber while gauging and accepting the risk of decompensation, or fly the patient 500-ish miles and accept the risk of a delay in care?
Best regards,
DDM