OK other medical people....
In one of the other threads there was a link to olympus diving, in north carolina, US. They have an article on why they want people to use lower ppO2. ( http://www.olympusdiving.com/po2s.pdf ) On page 2 is sais 'It [haemoglobin] is also responsible for transporting CO2, the by-product of metabolism, back to the lungs for exhalation. In the presence of both O2 and CO2, Hemoglobin will bind with the oxygen rather than the carbon dioxide.'
I haven't forgotten my basic biochemistry have I, but surely about 95% of the CO2 is carried back as dissolved bicarbonate?
If I am correct (which I hope I am) then why have they written such rubbish? It is hopelessly wrong. Oxygenated blood (ie with O2 bound to haemoglobin) at ppO2=0.21ata will be exactly the same as the oxygenated blood at elevated ppO2 since the binding is efficient (The figure I remember is 99% of binding sites occupied at ppO2=0.21ata). All that the higher ppO2 will do is make the transfer of O2 from the air sac of the alvaeoli to the haemoglobin molecule more efficient (which considering it is pretty darn efficient to start with is going to be a minimal effect). Muscles will still be using O2 at the same rate, freeing up Haemoglobin molecules at the same rate (which will only depend on work done, not ppO2)
If I am correct, that negates one of their main argument for a lower ppO2.
Jon T
Purely out of interest, I've heard of Joel Silverstein in some diving related context, but who is he? and what does he do? Robert Decker on the other hand is some-one I have never heard of, again does anybody know who he is?
In one of the other threads there was a link to olympus diving, in north carolina, US. They have an article on why they want people to use lower ppO2. ( http://www.olympusdiving.com/po2s.pdf ) On page 2 is sais 'It [haemoglobin] is also responsible for transporting CO2, the by-product of metabolism, back to the lungs for exhalation. In the presence of both O2 and CO2, Hemoglobin will bind with the oxygen rather than the carbon dioxide.'
I haven't forgotten my basic biochemistry have I, but surely about 95% of the CO2 is carried back as dissolved bicarbonate?
If I am correct (which I hope I am) then why have they written such rubbish? It is hopelessly wrong. Oxygenated blood (ie with O2 bound to haemoglobin) at ppO2=0.21ata will be exactly the same as the oxygenated blood at elevated ppO2 since the binding is efficient (The figure I remember is 99% of binding sites occupied at ppO2=0.21ata). All that the higher ppO2 will do is make the transfer of O2 from the air sac of the alvaeoli to the haemoglobin molecule more efficient (which considering it is pretty darn efficient to start with is going to be a minimal effect). Muscles will still be using O2 at the same rate, freeing up Haemoglobin molecules at the same rate (which will only depend on work done, not ppO2)
If I am correct, that negates one of their main argument for a lower ppO2.
Jon T
Purely out of interest, I've heard of Joel Silverstein in some diving related context, but who is he? and what does he do? Robert Decker on the other hand is some-one I have never heard of, again does anybody know who he is?