Canon Powershot A520?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

I've decided on the A610 :D :D.
Hehe, look out for some photos from me in the new year..

Spoon I hope to best you with this camera :), you've got some great nudi pics in your gallery :11:
 
I am having the same issues trying to find a camera thats right for me. What made you decide on the A610 over the A520? I'm considering the A520 so any info I can get will help.

Miranda
 
cinder4320:
I am having the same issues trying to find a camera thats right for me. What made you decide on the A610 over the A520? I'm considering the A520 so any info I can get will help.

Miranda

Hey Miranda,
Well they're a couple differences between the A520 and A610, i'll start with the most obvious one.

  • A520 is 4 megapixels as opposed to the A610's 5 megapixels.
    Higher megapixels don't necessarily make one camera better than the other, but gives you some flexibility when it comes to cropping pictures and making prints of them.
  • A610 has a greater optical zoom range, 4x. More importantly though and the clincher for me is that it uses the new digic II processor as compared to the older DIGIC processor in the A520. Improved battery life, faster focusing... generally the camera would feel a lot faster.
  • Macro mode is better in this camera I believe, might be important if you were taking closeups of nudibranchs or christmas tree worms or whatever.

Quoting liberally from dpreview here http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canonA620/

Perhaps the biggest complaint about the A95 (and the A510 / A520 for that matter) was that some aspects of performance are pedestrian to say the least. Compared to most of Canon's current range these cameras feel - and are measurably - sluggish in some very important areas, such as focusing, image playback and shot-to-shot times. The reason is simple - these models use the original DIGIC processor (introduced back in 2002 - in digital camera terms, just around the time cavemen first started using sticks to fight the woolly mammoth), which though very capable, doesn't really cut the mustard in late 2005.The good news is that the A620 sports the newer - and much faster - DIGIC II processor. The even better news is that the difference this makes is immense, with virtually every aspect of the A620's performance not just beating its predecessor, but in most cases doing so by a very wide margin. In fact, for a budget model, the A620 is remarkably fast and feels very responsive indeed, and certainly it is now on a par with the best cameras in this class.

To put it simply I just think it's a better all round camera. But it would only be better to you if the improvements are worth the extra money to you.
Both have manual controls..
If your budget permits I'd definitely go for it, it lists for about $265 at most sites, but if you wait and shop carefully you should be able to find it for less than that :)

Anyway I'd suggest reading through some of the old topics in this forum or even doing a search you'll find a lot more info!

Check out this page for examples of pics the camera can take topside..
http://www.pbase.com/cameras/canon/powershot_a610
 

Back
Top Bottom