So you're saying that you dove while under the influence of a hallucinogen? Smoking weed doesn't change the structure of your retina. Humans cannot see ultraviolet light. You were stoned. And impaired is impaired, whether you're impaired from beer, weed, oxycodone, clonazepam, or magic mushrooms. Your claims above are no different than the alcoholic who boasts that he drives just fine when he's drunk. I've seen the results of that attitude in the trauma ICU more than once.
I have also seen medical marijuana work so I'm a believer in it when it's appropriately applied. And, I've seen the "right" to medical marijuana abused. Part of the stigma you mention comes from regular marijuana users with general legalization as a goal who advocate for medical marijuana. It's two different animals altogether, and their advocacy contaminates the legitimate science.
Best regards,
DDM
Re-read my post please, you must have been stoned the first time. Then answer the question again. Having a degree in anything only makes your opinion of value when properly applied and you have yet to do so. It must be difficult for you to accept the way you have practiced medicine has led to the deaths of so many due to overdose and misuse. Have any of your patients ever died as a result of the medicine that you prescribed? One death every 19 minutes as a result of pharmaceuticals, or is that not true? Will you have to read something or exercise your mind to find that out, yes. Will it help you to learn to avoid making inaccurate representations of the posts of others, maybe not.
You are a doctor, first do no harm. Your prestigious title is of little value of those in need when the service you deliver causes further harm to the patient when the harm can be safely avoided while still or even often giving better symptom relief. You said that MMJ has a place in modern medicine. I don't recall seeing you at the 8th annual conference on cannabinoid science(the greatest emerging field of medicine in the world) last week in Portland, OR. It may not be that important to you, but for hundreds of other doctors and millions of patients who will have the information disseminated it was. In India, the NEEM tree is used in 40% of their medicines, start drawing parallels. In California, where cannabis has been legal medically since 1996, there has been a 68% reduction in the amount of pharmaceuticals prescribed. Is that of note, do I seem stoned to you? I just smoked, am I hallucinating? Is your opinion more important than facts? Why have traffic fatalities fallen along with alcohol sales and domestic violence in California? Does that mean light up before diving, of course not!!
Please re-read my post and then please answer responsibly, thank you.
Just finished doing a bit of research on the ability to see UV, and I see that what I was speaking of what the brilliantness of the corals fluorescence, and only that one particular type of coral. I thought it was UV because of the purplish blue 'glow'
And not that it is any of your business, but I've had cataract replacements in both eyes(30 and 31 years old) from steroids given me in massive quantities to treat chemical burns to my lungs. I also have suspect glaucoma in both eyes with some tearing and enlarged nerve and cup. I hope I will never be so dismissive of others in my life as you, particularly when they deal with the areas of life I am held in high regard for.
---------- Post added May 13th, 2014 at 12:50 PM ----------
You cannot choose nature over chemicals. Nature IS physics and chemicals. Some natural chemicals are safe and helpful and some are not. Some man manipulated chemicals are safe and helpful and some are not. Whether something is natural or not is no indication of whether it is desirable. Rattle snake venom is natural.
Hi Steve,
I think you'll agree that luckily no one is using snake venom in their efforts to combat the effects of narcotics addiction or chronic pain, seizures or cancers. You might find it strangely accurate that if snake venom did work for those problems, you would likely use it if it was proven safe, even after having been systematically lied to about it being dangerous for your entire life. The obvious difference here being that cannabis has a safety record of zero deaths, ever. Whereas pharmaceuticals kill once every 19 minutes in the United States alone., They're chemically derived in a lab and have killed hundreds of thousands of people, as opposed to cannabis grown organically in a garden, having never caused a stand alone death.
I'm hopeful that other divers will lose their fear of discrimination against them for using cannabis as opposed to say...oxycontin and help bring the truth to everyone else. There is little good that comes from clashes on forums, but facts must prevail in matters of this importance and yesterday's misinformation is easily discredited today and can't be tolerated when the safety of divers and others is at stake.
I don't want to see anyone else, and you would never see me light up before a dive. As a genuine daily medical user I have not been 'high' in over a year. My tolerance is much higher then non smokers. I would bet that I have had in my system before diving as the result of residual half lives of different strains, more THC then would be needed make a non user 'high' Extrapolate...