PfcAJ
Contributor
And you know how much it bothers me to agree with AJ.
iPhone. iTypo. iApologize.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
And you know how much it bothers me to agree with AJ.
iPhone. iTypo. iApologize.
I think argon is often used because it insulates better than air. I've heard suggestions that argon tanks should have different valves and regs so that a diver could no mistakenly put a breathing reg on an argon bottle, but I don't know how common that risk is.
AFAIK, there's nothing in them that would be damaged by reasonable pressures, and this incident certainly indicates that they work just fine at nearly 6 ATA. Here's an abstract from a study that exposed some to 3ATA and 95% O2 (conditions that could be encountered in a hyperbaric chamber). They reached a maximum temperature of 269ºF but weren't destroyed and didn't spontaneously ignite.
Air-activated chemical warming devices: effects of oxygen and pressure. - PubMed - NCBI
Perhaps you could get one to ignite with >95% fO2 at some pressure above 3ATA. It would make for a really exciting dive if you managed that inside your drysuit. Which makes me wonder ...
Does that require having your underwear O2 cleaned?
AFAIK, there's nothing in them that would be damaged by reasonable pressures, and this incident certainly indicates that they work just fine at nearly 6 ATA. Here's an abstract from a study that exposed some to 3ATA and 95% O2 (conditions that could be encountered in a hyperbaric chamber). They reached a maximum temperature of 269ºF but weren't destroyed and didn't spontaneously ignite.
Air-activated chemical warming devices: effects of oxygen and pressure. - PubMed - NCBI
Perhaps you could get one to ignite with >95% fO2 at some pressure above 3ATA. It would make for a really exciting dive if you managed that inside your drysuit. Which makes me wonder ...
Does that require having your underwear O2 cleaned?
It should be clear that I was was addressing chilly's question, which asked about damage. The original story makes it clear that the pads aren't damaged at pressures of nearly 6ATA. The abstract I linked offers another example showing that they work perfectly (or too) well at increased pressures, and provides some additional info about just how well they work under those particular conditions.You might want re-read what you posted (no offense intended). Damage to the pack is not the issue.
I'm guessing that almost everybody realizes that 269º is really hot and can cause burns. If somebody reads this thread and still can't figure out that using chemical heat pads under increased pressure is a bad idea I'll have a hard time mustering much sympathy if they hurt themselves.The pack reaching 269*F is hot enough to quickly boil water and cause quite a serious burn.
I am new'ish to diving, is it safe to use a heat pack with a wetsuit above 30mt?
I am new'ish to diving, is it safe to use a heat pack with a wetsuit above 30mt?
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk