Bubble models for recreational profiles

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

decidedlyodd

Contributor
Messages
176
Reaction score
34
Location
Seattle
# of dives
200 - 499
I'm not sure if this is the right place for this, so mods please move if this would fit better elsewhere.

I just finished reading Powell's Deco for Divers. Interesting read with lots of good information, although it could use a second edition with some better editing for sure.

It seems like there's a lot of evidence supporting the use of a bubble model algorithm like VPM-B over Buhlmann ZHL16-B with gradient factors for decompression diving, but what about for minimum/no decompression recreational profiles?
 
I think it's extremely difficult to prove that anything is "better" for recreational profiles, because the incidence of DCS is already so very low. It would take a lot of diving to show a difference between models. Marroni has done some work on ascent strategies, using Doppler grades as an endpoint, that showed that very fast and very slow ascents are both bad; the best is a medium rate ascent with stops. To me, this more or less supports the minimum deco approach, although that was not one of the strategies tested.
 

Back
Top Bottom