+1 to the comments made by vladimir. I also like what Charlie99 had to say (as usual).
@g1138: Eh? Computers only lock-out (if lock-out is incorporated into the design) when the user surfaces with an unfulfilled deco obligation.
If one computer dies, then you use the other one. No conflict at all.
Diving two computers which use different algorithms only "works" if the user ensures that the dive profile doesn't violate the more conservative computer.
Yup that is true. I was speaking in a worst case scenario; perhaps lockout wasn't the best choice of words. It'd be my preference, if I had 2 different dive computers, to dive the more conservative one as my primary.
Edit: I was re-thinking about this example carefully before posting.
You're nearing deco and your primary comp goes out. You're conservative backup is already into deco. You weren't planning on going into deco and you don't have the air to do a deco stop (cause you're an idiot). So you ascend, safety stop, and skip deco (as your liberal primary computer would have just listed a safety stop).
Now you have a dead primary and locked out back up.
Unlikely, but possible?
![IDK :idk: :idk:](/community/styles/scubaboard/smilies/idontknow.png)
PS Not meaning to imply anything by using the word "you"
Last edited: