Aspect Ratio Guidelines

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

gstrek

Contributor
Messages
413
Reaction score
205
Location
Grosse Pointe, Michigan
# of dives
200 - 499
The E-PL1 can shoot a number of aspect ratios (4:3, 3:2, 16:9, 6:6) and it is easliy selectable from the menu. Are there any guidelines as to which to use when? Is there a preference?

If I was shooting for movies or display on HDTV, choosing 16:9 makes sense.
Choose 3:2 ratio for no cropping of 4x6 prints, some cropping for 13x19.
Choose 4:3 ratio for printing 8.5x11 with a little cropping.

I tend to crop pretty tight when I shoot and what is fine at 8.5x11 gets the top and bottom severely cropped out of a 4x6 print. I have so far used the 'default' 4x3 (hey, it is a micro four-thirds system!) but am strongly considering shooting 3:2.

So what are you using? Hints or guidelines?
 
Hi Gary,

Both the Panasonic and Olympus Micro four thirds systems have a 4/3 sensor which is 17.3 X 13 mm the aspect ratio for 4/3. The size of the sensor does not change because you set a different aspect ratio on the camera. All that is happening is that less of the sensor is being used, so if you go to 16:9 you cut off or crop out the top and bottom of the sensor reducing the number of MP's be used to capture the image. Using 3:2 and 6:6 do the same thing, so the only way you get to use the full 12.3 MP's on the sensor is to shoot at 4:3, It is true that some of this information will be lost making a print and for 4 X 6 inch prints you could be using a 2 MP sensor and you could not tell the difference. Most print sizes and magazine sizes require larger crops from a 3:2 format cameras than from 4:3 format cameras. This is one reason most medium format cameras are 4:3.

Phil Rudin
 
I understand that the sensor doesn't change and in fact, the LCD display shows a 'black bar' on the top and bottom when set to other than 4:3 showing what you see is what you get.

From what I gather, a photographer might choose the in camera aspect ratio depending on the ultimate use of the photo: for magazine, for snapshot prints, for art prints, etc. if minimized cropping is desired. Otherwise, shoot 4:3, don't crop as tight in the shot to allow for cropping the final, finished product. Interesting that 35 mm is essentially a 3:2 ratio.

Thanks,
 
I have found that I mostly view my photos (and videos) on 16*9 screens (PC & HDTV), so I have pretty much decided to use the 16 x 9 format. I do lose the ability to move the image up or down a bit when cropping by lopping off the top and bottom, but the flip side is you get more pix per card.
BTW. RAW always saves the whole image.
 
A separate but somewhat related question: What color space do you use -Adobe or sRGB?

For electronic display the choice would seem to be sRGB. What woud you choose for printing and publishing? Is this a moot point if shooting RAW?
 

Back
Top Bottom