Ascent rate indicators and lag time

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

TSandM

Missed and loved by many.
Rest in Peace
ScubaBoard Supporter
Messages
36,348
Reaction score
13,723
Location
Woodinville, WA
This is a spinoff from the "how can we trust any of them" computer thread.

Uncle Pug made the observation that use of ascent rate indicators introduces hysteresis. A discussion sort of started but got stalled, but I'm still curious about this. I would have PM'd UP, but he seemed to want to continue the discussion publicly, so excuse me if this is too obsessive to interest anybody else :)

I assume the reference is to one of two things: Either the ascent rate indicator is lagging the actual ascent rate, or the diver's response lags from the indicator.

Thinking this through: My computer samples every twenty seconds. It requires at least two values to calculate a rate of change. The calculation is going to be, from my viewpoint, done instantaneously, and I would assume the refresh rate on the screen is also effectively instantaneous. But twenty seconds is a fair amount of time, and if my ascent rate is accelerating during that time, for example, the indicator will show me the average rate for the period. In the time it takes me to look at the indicator and decide on my reaction, my ascent rate may be quite a bit higher than what I saw and I may not intervene enough to slow it. Or, if I've slowed, I may intervene too much, in either case creating a mismatch between rate and response.

In addition, of course, the diver's intervention is not instantaneously effective because of momentum and water resistance.

I'm assuming these factors are what UP was referring to as being the problem with using ascent rate indicators alone. So the question remains, what is the best feedback to allow the diver to most closely control ascent rate? Seems to me that a visual reference is ideal, assuming the diver has any sense of scale on it. But a visual reference is not always available. Can you learn to interpret sensations carefully enough to calibrate them? I mean, I know if I am descending rapidly because of the rate of increase of pressure in my ears -- but that doesn't work for ascents because my ears clear themselves continuously and I don't feel it. Loosening of the dry suit will tell me I've ascended but not how fast . . . UP, what say you?
 
I ignore my ascent rate indicator and just watch my depth or use a visual reference as I ascend. On a wrist mounted Oceanic, the indicator can show excessive ascent rates just by raising your arm.
 
You're right on with sample rate being the key. I've heard folks say if they knew when samples were taken couldn't they ascend 10 ft - 1ft in one second and get the same reaction. Well there is more to the formula. Also once you have hit an ascent alarm the system will stay in alarm until a number of samples have indicated you have corrected this. My cochran commander does 1 second sampling, frankly it's way to sensitive for me. My Suunto Cobra does 10 second sampling it's not sensitive enough. I prefer a 30 feet per minute ascent rate.

Edit: I should add what I really prefer above all else is a bottom conture which enforces the ascent rate. A long dive along the bottom coming in to the exit point, is a sweet setup.
 
Wow what an eye opener.

I have not purchased a computer yet but the 20 second refresh rate is an eye opener. My Timex helix has a 5 second refresh and I find that almost useless for skin-diving. Most of my diving has been shore diving with gentle ascents built in. When I've done a free ascent's I've watched my rate in steps and stay on the safe side using my watch and analog gaige..

The human reaction side we all know from drivers education class and it's no different here. Second thought perhaps worse if you don't have your air dump poised for action time will continue to slip.

I like a visual, like a qaurry wall when doing a deep water straight down descent, especially if I need to stall for equalization. Since I intend to retain full analog capability when I do get my computer I can still do an analog ascent with computer monitoring.

Pete.
 
If you are using a suunto vyper or similar, you can reset the sampling rate to 10 seconds which makes a big difference in how fast you see changes. Have to use the download software to do it.

The depth numbers and the ascent bar are all working from the same info. With a 20 second rate, IMHO its not updating frequently enough for good + smooth "no depth reference ascents". Like what you are expected to do in DIRF and other classes of that series...
Because the data displayed is lagging your efforts at depth correction, it can contribute to a "bouncy" ascent.

Oceanic hockey puck computers (and maybe others from the same manufacturer) seem to use a fast sampling rate and be less susceptible to contributing to this problem. Ditto for the suunto D3 (although it has other longevity/durability problems)
 
awap:
I ignore my ascent rate indicator and just watch my depth or use a visual reference as I ascend. On a wrist mounted Oceanic, the indicator can show excessive ascent rates just by raising your arm.

What AWAP said :D

If you shine your dive light straigh ahead there is always some particulate matter in the water to judge your speed by.
 
I could be wrong but I think the 20 sec rate you are talking about is the rate the computer stores information in memory not how often it is sampling for the display. I know on my Cobra just raising the computer to quickly to view it can trigger a fast ascent. Again I could be wrong.
 
gcbryan:
What AWAP said :D

If you shine your dive light straigh ahead there is always some particulate matter in the water to judge your speed by.

And how often is particulate static especially as divers are in the water column?

Pete
 
I thought I read somewhere that Suunto computers sample more often (for calculation purposes) than it records those samples (for logging purposes).

And even if the ascent rate sampling was realtime, I know at least my own ability to change my ascent rate isn't instantaneous.
 
KenJr:
I could be wrong but I think the 20 sec rate you are talking about is the rate the computer stores information in memory......

Ding Ding Ding

We have a winner.
 

Back
Top Bottom