Perhaps it's a strong word, but the questioning is happening without evidence, and is off topic in this thread. Are you willing to create another?
It is "questioning" of an "apparent" phenomenon based on what appears to be a higher rate of incidences of diver fatality/accidents to a specific diver nationality that has a much lower population number than other populations in other countries that have lower number of fatalities. It is a phenomenon that makes some stop, take notice and question it. No conclusions are drawn yet. Some folks, several, from the same country and the neighboring countries claim that the referenced population is known to be more daring and aggressive in diving and maybe cavalier in their observance of safety rules in diving.
I think that this discussion is very relevant to this thread in THIS forum. This is the "
Accidents and Incidents" forum where "
Accidents and Incidents" are mentioned and discussions follow to analyze what could have happened and why. This isn't the "Passing" (The obituary forum) forum where posts simply announce the passing of a diver and the commentators offer their condolences. It would be inappropriate to discuss and dissect the death of a diver in "Passing" forum but it is most relevant in the "
Accidents and Incidents" forum. It is expected to discuss/dissect the accident and look at it from all different prospective even the unthinkable and the not so obvious in the "
Accidents and Incidents."
Here is the description shown at the header of the forum:
"
Accidents and Incidents
This forum is for the discussion of diving Accidents and Incidents and has
Special Rules. Please read the
Special Rules at the top of the forum before posting threads or responses. Please post your surprise, indignation and any memorials in the
Passings Forum."
And here are the rules for the forum:
Special Rules for the Accidents and Incidents Forum
It clearly supports what I said above concerning this forum and the "Passing" forum.
There is no disrespect or any other feelings towards the deceased here, it is merely cold academic observations and attempt to analyze the situation.
"Xenophobia" in this context isn't only "strong word," it is actually totally wrong and irrelevant and grossly out of context.